Subscribe now

Refer a friend

Few archaeological wonders provoke as much awe, mystery, and quiet reverence as the Moai of Easter Island. Standing against the vast Pacific Ocean, these colossal stone figures seem less like monuments and more like sentinels—watchers caught between time, land, and sky. To encounter the Moai, even through photographs or scholarly descriptions, is to feel the weight of a civilisation that spoke not through texts, but through stone.

This article explores the history, meaning, craftsmanship, and enduring legacy of the Moai.

Easter Island (Rapa Nui): Geography and Isolation

Easter Island, known locally as Rapa Nui, lies over 3,500 kilometres west of continental Chile. It is one of the most isolated inhabited islands on Earth. This extreme isolation has shaped not only its ecology but also its culture, worldview, and artistic expression.

The island’s volcanic origins provided both the material and the inspiration for the Moai. Basalt, red scoria, and most notably volcanic tuff from the Rano Raraku quarry, became the raw substance from which an entire civilisation carved its identity. In such isolation, creativity turned inward, giving rise to a monumental tradition unmatched anywhere else in Polynesia.

What Are the Moai?

The Moai are massive stone statues carved by the Rapa Nui people between approximately 1250 and 1500 CE. There are nearly 1,000 known Moai, varying greatly in size and finish.

Most Moai share distinctive features:

• Elongated heads, often comprising nearly one-third of the statue’s total height

• Heavy brows and deep-set eyes

• Long, stylised noses

• Thin, pursed lips

• Arms carved close to the body, hands resting on the abdomen

Contrary to popular belief, Moai are not just “heads.” Many statues have full torsos buried underground, revealed through modern excavations. Some stand over 10 metres tall and weigh more than 80 tonnes, making their creation and transportation one of archaeology’s great puzzles.

The Spiritual Meaning of the Moai

To the Rapa Nui, the Moai were not mere decorations or symbols of power; they were embodiments of ancestral spirits. Each statue represented a deceased chief or important ancestor, believed to possess mana, a spiritual force that protected and nourished the living community.

Significantly, most Moai were erected on ceremonial stone platforms called ahu, facing inland rather than toward the sea. This orientation suggests that the ancestors were watching over their descendants, guarding villages and ensuring prosperity.

In this sense, the Moai blur the boundary between the living and the dead. They are not memorials in the modern sense, but active spiritual presences, carved to sustain cosmic balance.

Rano Raraku: The Quarry of Creation

The volcanic crater of Rano Raraku is the birthplace of nearly all Moai. Walking through this quarry today feels like stepping into a frozen moment of history. Half-carved statues lie embedded in the rock, some abandoned mid-creation, as if the sculptors simply laid down their tools and never returned.

Artisans carved the Moai directly from the cliff face, starting with the front and later freeing the statue from the rock. Stone tools called toki, made from harder basalt, were used in the process.

The unfinished Moai at Rano Raraku are invaluable to scholars. They reveal carving techniques, stylistic evolution, and even mistakes—human fingerprints in a tradition often mythologised beyond recognition.

How Were the Moai Moved?

Perhaps the most enduring mystery surrounding the Moai is how they were transported across the island. Some statues were moved over distances of more than 15 kilometres without wheels, metal tools, or large domesticated animals.

Several theories exist:

• Log rollers or sledges, suggesting extensive deforestation

• Rocking or “walking” methods, where the statue is tilted and moved upright using ropes

• Combined methods, adapted to terrain and statue size

Recent experimental archaeology has demonstrated that Moai could indeed be “walked” upright by coordinated teams pulling ropes from side to side. Interestingly, local oral traditions long claimed that the Moai “walked” to their ahu—an example of myth aligning with scientific plausibility.

The Pukao: Red Stone Topknots

Some Moai wear large red stone cylinders known as pukao, often described as topknots or ceremonial hairstyles. These were carved from red scoria at the quarry of Puna Pau, a different volcanic site.

The pukao may symbolise:

• High social status

• Sacred hairstyles associated with mana

• Ritual completeness of the statue

Their addition increased the height and visual authority of the Moai, further emphasising hierarchy and spiritual presence.

The Collapse of Moai Culture

By the late 16th or early 17th century, Moai construction ceased. Many statues were deliberately toppled, their ahu abandoned. This period coincides with environmental degradation, population stress, and internal conflict.

Deforestation—partly due to statue transportation and agriculture—led to soil erosion and reduced food supplies. As resources dwindled, the social and spiritual systems that sustained Moai culture began to fracture.

The rise of the Birdman cult (Tangata Manu) marked a shift from ancestor worship to competitive ritual leadership. The Moai, once sources of protection, became symbols of a world that could no longer sustain itself.

European Contact and Further Damage

When Europeans first arrived in the 18th century, they encountered a society already transformed. Subsequent contact proved devastating. Slave raids, introduced diseases, and colonial exploitation decimated the population.

Many Moai were damaged or removed during this period, their meanings misunderstood or dismissed. What had once been sacred ancestors were reinterpreted as curiosities—mute stones in a global museum of empire.

Restoration and Modern Archaeology

The 20th century brought renewed interest in preserving and understanding the Moai. Archaeological projects, often in collaboration with the Rapa Nui people, have re-erected several statues on their original ahu.

Modern archaeology emphasises cultural respect, recognising that the Moai are not simply artefacts but living symbols of identity. Rapa Nui voices now play a central role in conservation, interpretation, and tourism management.

Standing Moai today are not reconstructions of a lost past, but acts of cultural recovery.

The Moai in the Modern Imagination

The Moai occupy a unique place in global consciousness. They appear in textbooks, documentaries, and popular culture, often stripped of context and reduced to mystery.

Yet their power lies precisely in what they resist: easy explanation. They ask enduring questions about:

• Human ambition and creativity

• The relationship between art, power, and ecology

• The costs of monumentality

• The fragility of civilisations

Personally, the Moai feel less like answers and more like questions carved in stone—questions about what we choose to build, whom we choose to remember, and what future generations will inherit from us.

Why the Moai Still Matter

In an age of rapid technological advancement and environmental anxiety, the Moai speak with quiet urgency. They remind us that even the most sophisticated cultures are bound by ecological limits, and that art, however monumental, cannot outlast the systems that sustain it.

At the same time, they affirm something deeply human: the desire to honour ancestors, to leave meaning behind, and to shape the world not just for utility, but for remembrance.

The Moai endure not because they are indestructible, but because they continue to be interpreted, protected, and re-loved.

Conclusion: Stone Faces, Human Lessons

The Moai of Easter Island are among humanity’s most haunting creations. Born from volcanic rock and spiritual devotion, toppled by crisis, and raised again by remembrance, they embody both the heights and vulnerabilities of civilisation.

They stand as ancestors, artworks, warnings, and witnesses. To study them is not only to learn about the Rapa Nui, but to confront ourselves—our ambitions, our limits, and our responsibility to the past and future alike.

In their silence, the Moai speak volumes.

Interested in learning about other iconic archaeological discoveries?

Check out the following articles:

1. Rosetta Stone

2. Great Sphinx of Giza

3. Terracotta Army

4. Dead Sea Scrolls

5. Olmec Colossal Heads

   ---

Subscribe now

Refer a friend

Subscribe now

Refer a friend

The Olmec Colossal Heads stand among the most iconic and enduring symbols of ancient Mesoamerican civilization. These massive sculptures—carved from single basalt boulders—continue to fascinate archaeologists, historians, and travelers alike. As some of the earliest monumental artworks in the Americas, the colossal heads offer valuable insights into the Olmec people, their social structures, artistic achievements, and cultural influence.

Origins of the Olmec Civilization

The Olmec civilization flourished on the Gulf Coast of present-day Mexico, primarily in the states of Veracruz and Tabasco, between 1500 BCE and 400 BCE. Often referred to as the “mother culture” of Mesoamerica, the Olmecs laid the foundations for later civilizations such as the Maya and the Aztec.

Olmec society centered around major ceremonial sites including San Lorenzo, La Venta, and Tres Zapotes. These urban and ritual centers contained plazas, mounds, pyramids, and elite residences—suggesting a complex, hierarchical society. It was within this vibrant cultural landscape that the colossal heads emerged as monumental artistic and political symbols.

Discovery and Early Excavations

Although local communities had always known about the stone heads, the archaeological world first learned of the Olmec Colossal Heads in the mid-19th century. The first head was recorded in 1862 by José María Melgar y Serrano, who was startled by its life-like features and sheer size.

More systematic excavations began during the 20th century, particularly under archaeologists such as Matthew Stirling, who recognized the colossal heads as part of a much older culture than previously believed. Their discoveries helped establish the Olmecs as a major early civilization and shed light on Mesoamerican cultural origins.

Today, seventeen known colossal heads have been documented at four major sites:

• San Lorenzo – 10 heads

• La Venta – 4 heads

• Tres Zapotes – 2 heads

• Rancho la Cobata – 1 head

Each site provides unique stylistic and historical contexts that help scholars understand the evolution of Olmec sculptural traditions.

Monumental Scale and Material

One of the most astonishing aspects of the Olmec Colossal Heads is their size. These sculptures stand between 1.17 meters and 3.4 meters tall and can weigh up to 50 tons. The stones used were typically basalt, a hard volcanic rock sourced from the Tuxtla Mountains, sometimes over 60–80 kilometers away from the sites where the heads were installed.

Transporting such enormous boulders without the wheel, beasts of burden, or metal tools was an extraordinary achievement. Scholars believe the Olmecs used a combination of:

• River rafts

• Wooden rollers

• Human labor

• Engineering knowledge

The massive scale of the heads reflects both the technical skill and the social organization required to make their creation possible.

Distinctive Features of the Colossal Heads

Each colossal head is uniquely carved, although they share common stylistic traits. These features highlight the Olmecs’ sophisticated artistic abilities and their attention to naturalistic detail.

Facial Characteristics

The heads typically display:

• Broad, flat noses

• Full lips

• Prominent cheeks

• Distinctive jawlines

• Deeply carved eyes

These faces exude individuality—no two heads look alike—which suggests that each sculpture represents a specific person.

Headgear and Decorations

One of the defining features of the colossal heads is the helmet-like headgear. These headdresses often include:

• Bands

• Plumes

• Symbols or motifs

• Earspools or ear ornaments

The helmets likely depict gear worn by rulers during rituals, warfare, or ceremonial sports. Their detailed ornamentation provides important clues about Olmec clothing and elite regalia.

Who Did the Colossal Heads Represent?

The precise identity and purpose of the colossal heads remain debated, but the most widely accepted interpretation is that they represent Olmec rulers. This view is supported by several key observations:

Individualized Portraits

The unique facial expressions and features strongly indicate portraiture rather than generic depictions.

Elite Contexts

Many heads were discovered in ceremonial centers or elite compounds—areas associated with power and governance.

Symbolic Power

The heads’ size and prominence suggest that they served as powerful political symbols, immortalizing the authority and prestige of the ruling elite.

While some alternative theories propose that the heads represent athletes, gods, or legendary figures, the consensus strongly favors the ruler-portrait interpretation.

Carving Techniques and Craftsmanship

Creating a colossal head required remarkable craftsmanship. Olmec sculptors used stone tools, likely made from harder materials such as obsidian or jadeite, to shape the basalt. The carving process included:

1. Rough Shaping – Removing large sections of stone with hammerstones.

2. Fine Carving – Adding facial details, headdress motifs, and textures.

3. Smoothing and Polishing – Using sand, water, and abrasives.

The precision and realism of the finished works reveal a highly skilled artisan class and long-standing sculptural traditions within Olmec society.

Cultural and Religious Significance

The colossal heads likely served multiple cultural and ritual functions:

Political Authority

As portraits of rulers, the heads reinforced the authority of leaders and the social hierarchy.

Ancestral Veneration

Some scholars believe the heads honored ancestral figures, connecting living rulers with divine or heroic predecessors.

Ritual Spaces

The placement of heads in plazas or ceremonial complexes suggests they played a role in public rites, processions, and political gatherings.

Whatever their exact meaning, the colossal heads were clearly central to Olmec identity and civic symbolism.

Rediscovery, Preservation, and Challenges

Today, the colossal heads are displayed in museums, archaeological parks, and protected sites throughout Mexico. Notable institutions like the Museo de Antropología de Xalapa and the Museo Nacional de Antropología in Mexico City house several well-preserved examples.

However, preservation presents challenges:

• Basalt weathers over time

• Tourism can strain fragile archaeological environments

• Vandalism and environmental threats pose risks

Mexico’s cultural institutions and archaeological authorities continue to implement conservation strategies to preserve these ancient masterpieces for future generations.

Legacy and Influence on Mesoamerican Culture

The Olmec Colossal Heads had a lasting impact on later Mesoamerican cultures. The Olmecs’ artistic styles, societal structures, and religious concepts influenced civilizations such as the Maya, Zapotec, and Aztec.

Artistic Influence

Later cultures adopted elements of Olmec iconography, including:

• Monumental stone sculpture

• Ruler portraiture

• Ceremonial headdresses

Cultural Prestige

Today, the colossal heads serve as enduring symbols of Mexico’s indigenous heritage and are celebrated for their artistic and historical value.

Why the Colossal Heads Still Fascinate Us Today

The Olmec Colossal Heads continue to captivate modern audiences because they offer a rare window into a civilization that left no written records. Their expressive faces, monumental scale, and mysterious origins inspire awe and spark curiosity.

These remarkable sculptures stand as a testament to the Olmecs’ engineering ingenuity, artistic mastery, and cultural sophistication. For archaeologists and history enthusiasts alike, the colossal heads represent one of the most fascinating legacies of ancient Mesoamerica.

Interested in learning about other iconic archaeological discoveries?

Check out the following articles:

1. Mask of Tutankhamun

2. Rosetta Stone

3. Great Sphinx of Giza

4. Terracotta Army

5. Dead Sea Scrolls

   ---

Subscribe now

Refer a friend

Subscribe now

Refer a friend

The Dead Sea Scrolls stand as one of the most remarkable archaeological discoveries of the twentieth century, transforming the understanding of ancient Judaism and the origins of Christianity. Found in the mid-20th century in the arid cliffs and caves near the Dead Sea, these manuscripts—dating from roughly the third century BCE to the first century CE—offer an unparalleled glimpse into religious thought, community life, and scriptural traditions of the time. Beyond their religious and cultural value, the Scrolls have also ignited scholarly debates, political controversies, and theological reflections that continue to this day.

Discovery of the Scrolls

In 1947, a young Bedouin shepherd is said to have stumbled upon a cave near Qumran on the northwestern shores of the Dead Sea while searching for a lost goat. Inside, he discovered clay jars containing ancient scrolls wrapped in linen. This accidental find sparked a series of explorations that led to the uncovering of thousands of manuscript fragments in eleven caves between 1947 and 1956.

The early handling of the Scrolls was chaotic. Some were sold on the black market, while others reached scholars through antiquities dealers. The first batch was published quickly, and as excavations expanded, it became clear that this was a discovery of unparalleled historical and religious significance. In addition to the caves, excavations at Qumran itself revealed the remains of a settlement believed to have been inhabited by a Jewish sect, possibly the Essenes, who may have been responsible for the scrolls.

Contents of the Dead Sea Scrolls

The Dead Sea Scrolls include over 900 manuscripts, though most survive only as fragments. They can be broadly divided into three categories:

1. Biblical Texts: These manuscripts include copies of nearly every book of the Hebrew Bible (except the Book of Esther). Some are remarkably similar to the Masoretic Text—the authoritative Hebrew version of the Bible used in Judaism—while others differ significantly, offering alternative readings that illuminate how scripture developed over time.

2. Sectarian Writings: These are unique to the Qumran community and shed light on their beliefs, rules, and practices. Texts such as the Community Rule outline strict codes of behavior, while the War Scroll describes an apocalyptic battle between the “Sons of Light” and the “Sons of Darkness.” These writings reflect the sect’s sense of separation from mainstream Judaism and its expectation of divine intervention in history.

3. Other Religious Texts: These include works such as hymns, commentaries on scripture (pesharim), calendars, and apocryphal or pseudepigraphal texts that were popular during the Second Temple period. They highlight the diversity of Jewish religious thought at the time and show how scripture and tradition were fluid rather than fixed.

Language and Materials

The Scrolls are written primarily in Hebrew, though some are in Aramaic and a few in Greek, reflecting the linguistic diversity of Judea during the period. The manuscripts were inscribed on parchment, papyrus, and, in one rare case, copper. The use of different materials and scripts indicates both the practical needs of the community and the wide range of sources they preserved.

The condition of the Scrolls varies greatly. Many are fragmented and fragile due to centuries of exposure to the harsh desert environment. Nevertheless, their survival is extraordinary, aided by the dry climate and the protective environment of the caves.

The Qumran Community and the Essenes

One of the enduring debates about the Dead Sea Scrolls concerns the identity of their authors. The prevailing theory links the scrolls to the Essenes, a Jewish sect described by ancient historians such as Josephus, Philo, and Pliny the Elder. According to this view, the Qumran settlement was an Essene community that preserved these texts in their library and hid them in caves during times of crisis, such as the Roman conquest of Judea in the first century CE.

The Essenes are believed to have lived a communal, ascetic lifestyle with strict rules of purity, discipline, and devotion. Their writings reflect a worldview that emphasized dualism—light versus darkness, good versus evil—and a strong expectation of an imminent apocalyptic end of days. However, some scholars argue that the scrolls may represent a broader range of Jewish groups, not just the Essenes, or that they were collected from various communities across Judea.

Impact on Biblical Studies

The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls has profoundly affected biblical scholarship. Before their discovery, the oldest complete Hebrew manuscripts of the Bible dated to the 10th century CE. The Scrolls pushed the textual evidence back by more than a thousand years, providing a crucial link to the time when the Hebrew Bible was still being copied and standardized.

Comparisons between the Scrolls and later biblical texts reveal both continuity and variation. Some Scrolls match the Masoretic Text almost exactly, confirming its reliability, while others show differences in wording, order, or content, suggesting that multiple versions of biblical books circulated during the Second Temple period. This has deepened the understanding of how the Bible developed, highlighting its fluidity before canonization.

Relevance to Early Christianity

Another reason the Dead Sea Scrolls attract so much attention is their relevance to the study of early Christianity. The sectarian writings of the Qumran community share striking similarities with themes later found in Christian texts, including ideas about a messianic figure, apocalyptic expectations, and community organization.

While there is no evidence that Jesus or his followers were directly connected to the Qumran sect, the Scrolls demonstrate the diversity of Jewish thought at the time and the environment from which Christianity emerged. They also underscore that many concepts often thought of as uniquely Christian—such as messianism, eschatology, and baptismal rituals—were already present in various Jewish sects.

Controversies and Debates

The Dead Sea Scrolls have not been without controversy. For decades after their discovery, access to the manuscripts was tightly controlled by a small group of scholars, leading to accusations of secrecy and academic elitism. It was not until the 1990s that the Scrolls were fully published and made widely available, including through digital databases.

There have also been debates over ownership. The Scrolls were initially found in territory controlled by Jordan, later occupied by Israel after the 1967 Six-Day War. Both Jordan and Israel have claimed rights to the artifacts, while Palestinian authorities have also asserted ownership. This has made the Scrolls not only a scholarly treasure but also a political symbol.

Preservation and Modern Technology

Preserving the Dead Sea Scrolls has been a major challenge due to their age and fragility. Institutions such as the Israel Museum and the Shrine of the Book in Jerusalem house many of the manuscripts under carefully controlled conditions. Advances in imaging technology have played a crucial role in their study and preservation.

High-resolution photography, infrared imaging, and digital reconstruction techniques have allowed scholars to read faded texts and piece together fragments that were once thought unintelligible. Online platforms now provide access to these texts for researchers and the general public worldwide, democratizing a discovery that was once locked away.

Legacy and Ongoing Research

The legacy of the Dead Sea Scrolls is immense. They have transformed the study of the Hebrew Bible, illuminated Jewish religious diversity during the Second Temple period, and provided a context for understanding the roots of Christianity. Their discovery has reinforced the idea that religious traditions evolve in complex, contested ways and that the ancient world was far more varied than often assumed.

Research continues, as new fragments are still being analyzed and reinterpreted. Each advancement in technology or scholarship sheds fresh light on these ancient texts, ensuring that the Dead Sea Scrolls remain a vibrant area of study. Their enduring appeal lies not only in their historical and religious significance but also in their ability to provoke new questions about faith, community, and the transmission of sacred texts.

Conclusion

The Dead Sea Scrolls represent a bridge across millennia, connecting modern readers with the voices of an ancient community grappling with questions of faith, identity, and destiny. Their discovery was accidental, yet their impact has been monumental, reshaping biblical studies, deepening understanding of Judaism’s complexity, and providing a vital backdrop for the emergence of Christianity.

Though fragile and fragmented, the Scrolls embody resilience, surviving centuries in the harsh desert only to emerge in the modern world as a treasure trove of knowledge. They remain not just relics of the past, but living documents that continue to inspire scholarship, debate, and reflection on humanity’s enduring search for meaning.

Interested in learning about other iconic archaeological discoveries?

Check out the following articles:

1. Mask of Tutankhamun

2. Rosetta Stone

3. Great Sphinx of Giza

4. Terracotta Army

   ---

Subscribe now

Refer a friend

Subscribe now

Refer a friend

Christopher Columbus was an Italian explorer and navigator who is credited with leading the first expedition from Europe to the Americas.

Columbus’ voyages had a significant impact on world history, leading to the Columbian Exchange—a widespread exchange of goods, plants, animals, and diseases between the Old World and the New World.

Early Life

The early life of Christopher Columbus is not very well-documented, and some details remain uncertain. What we know about his early years comes from various historical records and writings.

1. Birth and Family: Christopher Columbus was born in the Republic of Genoa (modern-day Italy) around 1451. The exact date and place of his birth are not clear, as historical records differ on this matter. He was the eldest son of Domenico Colombo, a wool weaver and merchant, and Susanna Fontanarossa.

2. Education and Maritime Training: Columbus received a basic education, primarily learning reading, writing, and arithmetic. He likely attended local schools in Genoa and may have received some formal education in cartography, navigation, and astronomy. He also gained practical experience in maritime trade and navigation while working as an apprentice for his father and possibly as a sailor on merchant ships.

3. Early Travels: During his youth, Columbus undertook several voyages at sea. He is said to have sailed to various parts of the Mediterranean and perhaps even as far as Ireland and Iceland. These early travels instilled in him a passion for exploration and a desire to find a new route to Asia.

4. Move to Portugal: In his late teens or early twenties, Columbus moved to Portugal, where he continued his maritime activities. He worked as a cartographer and a sailor, gaining valuable knowledge and experience that would later play a crucial role in his ambitious plans to reach Asia by sailing westward.

5. Study and Speculations: While in Portugal, Columbus read various accounts and theories about the shape of the Earth and the possibility of reaching Asia by sailing westward. He studied the works of ancient Greek and Roman geographers, as well as contemporary scholars, which influenced his belief that a westward route to Asia was feasible.

First Voyage in the Quest for Asia

Christopher Columbus embarked on his first voyage in his quest for Asia on August 3, 1492, after several years of seeking support for his ambitious expedition.

1. Obtaining Royal Support: Columbus had presented his plan to various European monarchs, including the Portuguese and the English, but it was initially rejected. After years of lobbying and negotiation, Columbus finally gained an audience with the Catholic Monarchs of Spain, King Ferdinand II of Aragon and Queen Isabella I of Castile, who showed interest in his proposal.

2. The Capitulations of Santa Fe: On April 17, 1492, Columbus and the Spanish monarchs signed the Capitulations of Santa Fe, a contract that outlined the terms and conditions of the expedition. The agreement granted Columbus the title of “Admiral of the Ocean Sea,” appointed him Viceroy and Governor of the lands he discovered, and promised him a share of the riches he encountered.

3. Assembling the Expedition: With the support of the crown, Columbus began assembling the crew and supplies necessary for the voyage. The expedition was relatively small, consisting of three ships: the Santa Maria (flagship), the Pinta, and the Niña. The crews totaled about 90 men.

4. Departure from Palos: On August 3, 1492, Columbus and his expedition departed from the port of Palos de la Frontera in southwestern Spain. Palos was chosen as the starting point because it had been penalized by the crown and was required to provide ships for the voyage as part of its punishment.

5. The Voyage: The journey was challenging, and the crew faced various difficulties during the voyage. They crossed the Atlantic Ocean and encountered changing weather conditions, fears of sea monsters, and concerns about the length of the journey. Columbus’s navigational skills and leadership were instrumental in keeping the crew determined to continue.

6. Landfall in the Americas: After more than two months at sea, on October 12, 1492, the crew spotted land. This marked the first documented European contact with the New World.

First Landfall in the Americas

During his first landfall in the Americas on October 12, 1492, Christopher Columbus discovered an island in the present-day Bahamas. He named the island “San Salvador,” meaning “Holy Savior” in Spanish. It is believed that the island Columbus encountered is one of the following present-day locations:

1. Watling’s Island (now San Salvador Island, Bahamas): This is the generally accepted location as the site of Columbus’s first landfall. It is one of the islands in the eastern Bahamas.

2. Samana Cay (also in the Bahamas): Some historians and researchers propose that Samana Cay might be the actual site of Columbus’s first landfall, but this theory remains less widely accepted.

Regardless of the specific island, Columbus’s discovery marked the first recorded encounter between the Old World (Europe) and the New World (the Americas) since the continents had been isolated from each other for thousands of years.

During his initial interactions with the indigenous people he encountered on the island, Columbus believed he had reached the outskirts of the East Indies, which was his intended destination. He referred to the inhabitants as “Indians,” mistakenly thinking he had arrived in the Indian Ocean region.

Exploring the Americas

Upon arriving in the Americas, Christopher Columbus and his crew engaged in several activities and interactions with the indigenous people they encountered.

1. Interaction with Indigenous People: Columbus and his crew had their first contact with the indigenous people of the island of San Salvador. The native people they encountered were part of the Lucayan or Taino tribes. Columbus noted their appearance, dress, and the simple items they used, as well as their friendliness and lack of weaponry.

2. Claiming the Land: Columbus claimed the newly discovered lands for Spain, as he was sailing under the sponsorship of the Spanish Catholic Monarchs. He erected the Spanish flag on the islands he visited, symbolizing Spain’s possession of these territories.

3. Exploration of Surrounding Islands: Columbus and his crew continued their exploration of the Caribbean region, visiting several other islands, including Cuba (which Columbus believed was part of the Asian mainland) and Hispaniola (present-day Dominican Republic and Haiti).

4. Establishing a Settlement: On December 25, 1492, the Santa Maria, the flagship of Columbus’s expedition, ran aground and was wrecked off the coast of Hispaniola. With the remains of the ship, Columbus established a settlement called La Navidad (Christmas) on the island before leaving to return to Spain in January 1493.

5. Capturing Natives for Slavery: During his voyages, Columbus and his crew took some of the indigenous people captive. Columbus saw them as potential slaves who could be sent back to Spain. He aimed to impress the Catholic Monarchs with the fruits of his exploration, including the people he considered “convertible” to Christianity and those who could serve as slaves.

6. Documenting Discoveries: Columbus diligently kept a journal during his voyages, documenting his experiences, observations, and the geographical details of the lands he encountered. His logs served as valuable records of his voyages and contributed to further European exploration and colonization.

Subsequent Voyages to the Americas

Christopher Columbus undertook three more voyages to the Americas, all funded and supported by the Spanish Catholic Monarchs, King Ferdinand II of Aragon and Queen Isabella I of Castile. Here is an overview of each of his subsequent three voyages:

1. Second Voyage (1493-1496):

   • Departure: Columbus’s second voyage began on September 25, 1493, with a fleet of 17 ships and approximately 1,500 crew members.

   • Exploration: This time, he explored more islands in the Caribbean, including Puerto Rico and Jamaica, and returned to Hispaniola to find the settlement he had left there in ruins.

   • Return: Columbus returned to Spain in June 1496.

2. Third Voyage (1498-1500):

   • Departure: Columbus’s third voyage began on May 30, 1498, with a fleet of six ships.

   • Exploration: During this expedition, Columbus explored the South American mainland, specifically the coast of present-day Venezuela. He also visited the islands of Trinidad and Tobago.

   • Return: He returned to Spain in November 1500.

3. Fourth Voyage (1502-1504):

   • Departure: Columbus’s fourth and final voyage commenced on May 9, 1502, with a fleet of four ships.

   • Exploration: During this voyage, Columbus explored Central America, including present-day Honduras, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica. He also encountered strong storms and difficulties.

   • Return: Columbus returned to Spain in November 1504. This voyage marked the end of his explorations.

Despite his significant explorations and contributions to European knowledge of the Americas, Columbus never realized that he had reached a continent previously unknown to Europeans. Instead, he believed that he had found a westward route to Asia. His voyages, however, paved the way for further European exploration and the eventual colonization of the New World.

Effects of Columbus’ Voyages to the Americas

Christopher Columbus’ voyages to the Americas had profound and far-reaching effects on both the Old World (Europe) and the New World (the Americas). These effects, collectively known as the Columbian Exchange, brought about significant changes in various aspects of human society, economics, and culture.

Here are some of the key effects of Columbus’ voyages:

1. Exchange of Goods and Resources: The Columbian Exchange facilitated the exchange of goods, plants, animals, and resources between the Old World and the New World. European goods such as wheat, sugar, coffee, and horses were introduced to the Americas, while crops like potatoes, corn, tomatoes, and cocoa were brought back to Europe. This exchange of agricultural products had a profound impact on both continents’ diets and economies.

2. Spread of Diseases: The contact between Europeans and indigenous peoples led to the unintentional spread of diseases to which the indigenous populations had no immunity. Diseases like smallpox, measles, and influenza devastated the Native American populations, resulting in a demographic collapse and significant loss of life. This demographic disaster played a crucial role in the colonization and domination of the Americas by European powers.

3. European Colonization: Columbus’ voyages opened the way for subsequent European exploration and colonization of the Americas. Spain, Portugal, England, France, and other European powers established colonies in the New World, seeking wealth, resources, and strategic advantages. This colonization led to the establishment of new societies with diverse cultural influences.

4. Transatlantic Slave Trade: The colonization of the Americas created a demand for labor, and as the native populations declined, European powers turned to African slaves to work on plantations and in mines. The transatlantic slave trade became a brutal and tragic consequence of Columbus’ voyages, resulting in the forced migration of millions of Africans to the Americas.

5. Cultural Exchange: The interaction between Europeans and indigenous peoples also led to cultural exchange. Europeans introduced their languages, religion (Christianity), and customs to the Americas, while elements of Native American cultures, such as agricultural practices, artwork, and food, influenced European societies.

6. Technological and Navigational Advances: Columbus’ voyages contributed to advances in navigation and cartography, which furthered European exploration and expansion. The discovery of new lands and the need to navigate across vast oceans prompted the development of more advanced shipbuilding and navigation techniques.

7. Global Trade Network: The Columbian Exchange and subsequent European exploration led to the establishment of a global trade network that connected Europe, the Americas, Africa, and Asia. This interconnectedness profoundly shaped the world’s economic and political systems.

8. Impact on Indigenous Peoples: The arrival of Europeans had devastating consequences for the indigenous peoples of the Americas. They faced violence, forced labor, and displacement from their ancestral lands. Many indigenous cultures and languages were suppressed or lost, and their populations drastically declined due to diseases and mistreatment.

The effects of Columbus’ voyages are complex and continue to shape the world to this day.

Legacy

Here are some key aspects of Christopher Columbus’ legacy today:

1. Exploration and Discovery: Columbus’ voyages initiated a new era of European exploration and colonization of the Americas. His journeys opened up new trade routes and paved the way for the integration of previously isolated regions into a connected global network. Columbus is celebrated as a symbol of exploration and discovery in various cultures.

2. Controversy and Criticism: Columbus’ treatment of the indigenous peoples of the Americas, including forced labor, enslavement, and the introduction of diseases, has been widely criticized. Many consider his actions as contributing to the oppression and devastation of native populations.

3. Commemoration and Holidays: In some countries, Columbus Day is still celebrated as a national holiday to honor Columbus’ first arrival in the Americas. However, in response to the criticism and reevaluation of his legacy, some regions have replaced Columbus Day with alternative holidays focused on recognizing and celebrating the cultures and contributions of indigenous peoples.

4. Education and Historical Perspectives: The study of Christopher Columbus is a crucial aspect of history and social studies curricula in many educational systems. His exploration is taught as a significant event that shaped the course of world history. In recent years, efforts have been made to present a more comprehensive and balanced view of Columbus’ actions and their consequences, including acknowledging the experiences and perspectives of indigenous communities.

5. Monument Controversies: Statues and monuments of Christopher Columbus have been subject to controversies in various places. Some communities have removed or recontextualized Columbus statues due to their association with colonialism and the mistreatment of indigenous peoples. Others argue for the preservation of these monuments as historical artifacts and reminders of the past.

6. Indigenous Rights and Advocacy: Columbus’ legacy has also spurred discussions about indigenous rights, social justice, and historical accountability. Advocates for indigenous peoples’ rights highlight the need for recognition, respect, and reparations for the historical injustices and cultural impacts resulting from European colonization.

   Today, discussions surrounding Columbus’ legacy prompt reflection on the consequences of historical actions and the importance of understanding history from diverse perspectives.

Interested in learning about other explorers?

Check out the following articles:

1. Amerigo Vespucci: The Man Who Gave His Name to the Americas

2. Vasco da Gama and his Tainted Legacy

   ---

   Subscribe now

   ---

Refer a friend

Subscribe now

Refer a friend

The Terracotta Army, also known as the Terracotta Warriors and Horses, is a vast collection of life-sized sculptures made of clay that was discovered in the Shaanxi province of China. It is one of the most significant archaeological finds in the world.

What is the history of the Terracotta Army?

The history of the Terracotta Army is closely tied to the first emperor of China, Qin Shi Huang, and his reign during the Qin Dynasty (221-206 BC).

Qin Shi Huang came to power in 246 BC at the age of 13. He ascended the throne of the Qin state, which was one of several warring states in ancient China. Qin Shi Huang’s ambition was to unify these warring states and create a centralized empire. After years of military conquests, he successfully achieved his goal in 221 BC, becoming the first emperor of a unified China.

Qin Shi Huang was obsessed with the idea of immortality and eternal rule. He believed that he could continue to reign in the afterlife, and to ensure this, he ordered the construction of a grand mausoleum complex near his capital city, Xianyang (modern-day Xi’an).

The Terracotta Army was an integral part of this mausoleum complex. It was meant to accompany Qin Shi Huang in the afterlife and provide him with protection, as well as represent the military might of his empire. The construction of the army began around 246 BC and continued for several decades.

The construction of the Terracotta Army involved an enormous workforce and required skilled craftsmen and laborers. Historical accounts suggest that prisoners of war, conscripted laborers, and artisans from various regions of China were involved in the project.

What is the history behind the discovery and excavation of the artifact?

The excavation and discovery of the Terracotta Army is a fascinating story that began in 1974.

In March 1974, a group of farmers in the Lintong District of Shaanxi Province, China, were digging a well near the village of Xiyang. As they were digging, they stumbled upon fragments of terracotta statues and pottery. Recognizing the historical significance of their findings, they reported the discovery to the authorities.

Archaeologists from the Shaanxi Provincial Cultural Relics Bureau were dispatched to the site to investigate. They soon realized that they had come across something extraordinary. Excavations began, and the scale and significance of the find quickly became apparent.

The excavation site turned out to be part of the grand mausoleum complex of Emperor Qin Shi Huang. The Terracotta Army, which was buried in three large pits, was one of the most astonishing discoveries. Pit 1, the largest and most well-known pit contained the majority of the terracotta warriors in battle formation. Pit 2 contained a mix of soldiers, chariots, and cavalry, while Pit 3 was smaller and thought to represent the command center.

The discovery created a sensation both in China and around the world. It provided unprecedented insights into the military, culture, and artistry of ancient China. The news of the Terracotta Army spread rapidly, attracting attention from archaeologists, historians, and the general public.

Excavations at the site have continued for decades, and the scale of the discovery has only grown. Thousands of terracotta soldiers, along with weapons, chariots, and other artifacts, have been unearthed. Each new find deepens our understanding of the Qin Dynasty and its remarkable achievements.

What are the main characteristics of the artifact?

The Terracotta Army possesses several distinct characteristics that make it a remarkable archaeological and artistic achievement. Here are the main characteristics of the Terracotta Army:

1. Size and Scale: The Terracotta Army is a vast collection of life-sized sculptures. The army consists of thousands of individual statues, including soldiers, horses, chariots, and other military personnel. The scale of the army is monumental, with the figures ranging from around 5 feet 11 inches (1.8 meters) to 6 feet 7 inches (2 meters) in height.

2. Realism and Detail: The statues of the Terracotta Army are remarkably realistic and detailed. Each figure has distinct facial features, hairstyles, and clothing, reflecting the diverse ranks and roles within the army. The artisans who created the army paid careful attention to details such as armor, weapons, and footwear, showcasing their craftsmanship.

3. Individuality: One of the notable aspects of the Terracotta Army is that each soldier has unique facial features. It is believed that the statues were modeled after real soldiers and artisans of the time, resulting in a diverse range of facial expressions and features. This individuality adds a sense of realism and personality to the army.

4. Military Formation: The soldiers in the Terracotta Army were arranged in battle formation, reflecting the organization and tactics of the Qin Dynasty’s military. The soldiers are positioned in rows and columns, with infantry, archers, charioteers, and officers in distinct formations.

5. Artistic Variety: The Terracotta Army showcases a range of artistic styles and techniques. Different clay molds, sculpting methods, and surface treatments were used to create the various components of the army, including the soldiers, horses, and chariots. This artistic variety adds visual interest and highlights the skill of the artisans involved.

The combination of these characteristics makes the Terracotta Army an extraordinary archaeological and artistic treasure that continues to captivate people around the world.

What is the significance and legacy of the Terracotta Army?

The Terracotta Army holds immense significance and has left a lasting legacy in several aspects. Here are some key points regarding its significance and legacy:

1. Historical Importance: The Terracotta Army provides invaluable insights into the history of ancient China, particularly the Qin Dynasty. It offers a glimpse into the military organization, weaponry, and attire of the time, helping historians and archaeologists better understand ancient Chinese warfare and society.

2. Qin Shi Huang’s Legacy: The Terracotta Army is closely tied to the legacy of Emperor Qin Shi Huang, the first emperor to unify China. The grand mausoleum complex and the army itself demonstrate his vision, power, and ambition. It symbolizes his desire for eternal rule and protection in the afterlife.

3. Artistic and Technological Achievement: The Terracotta Army showcases the remarkable artistic and technological achievements of ancient China. The life-sized sculptures exhibit a high level of craftsmanship and attention to detail, highlighting the skill of the artisans involved. The construction methods and techniques used for the statues’ production demonstrate the advanced capabilities of Qin Dynasty craftsmen.

4. UNESCO World Heritage Site: The Terracotta Army has been recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage site since 1987. Its inclusion on this prestigious list acknowledges its outstanding universal value and the need for its preservation for future generations.

5. Tourism and Cultural Exchange: The Terracotta Army has become a major tourist attraction in China, attracting millions of visitors each year. It has also fostered cultural exchange by introducing people from around the world to the rich history, art, and culture of ancient China.

6. Conservation and Research: The discovery of the Terracotta Army has prompted extensive conservation efforts to protect and preserve the statues. Researchers continue to study the site, uncovering new insights about the Qin Dynasty and improving our understanding of ancient Chinese civilization.

7. Symbol of China: The Terracotta Army has become an iconic symbol of China’s rich history and cultural heritage. It represents the nation’s ancient roots, its ability to produce grand artistic creations, and its contributions to world history.

Interested in learning about other iconic archaeological discoveries?

Check out the following articles:

1. Mask of Tutankhamun

2. Rosetta Stone

3. Great Sphinx of Giza

   ---

Subscribe now

Refer a friend

Subscribe now

Refer a friend

The Great Sphinx of Giza is a monumental statue located on the Giza Plateau near Cairo, Egypt. It is an ancient symbol of Egypt and one of the world’s most recognizable and enigmatic landmarks. The Sphinx is situated on the west bank of the Nile River, facing directly toward the rising sun.

The statue depicts a mythical creature with the body of a lion and the head of a human, traditionally believed to represent the pharaoh Khafre of the Fourth Dynasty of ancient Egypt. However, the exact identity and purpose of the Sphinx remain a subject of debate among historians and Egyptologists.

The Great Sphinx is made of limestone and measures about 73 meters (240 feet) long and 20 meters (66 feet) tall. It is the largest monolithic statue in the world, carved from a single piece of rock. The Sphinx is believed to have been built around 2500 BCE during the Old Kingdom period of ancient Egypt, making the Sphinx over 4,500 years old.

What is the purpose of the monument?

The purpose of the Sphinx is a subject of speculation. It was likely constructed as a part of the larger funerary complex for Khafre, which includes the nearby pyramid bearing his name.

While many theories suggest it served as a guardian of the pyramids, protecting the pharaoh’s tomb and symbolizing royal power, there is no consensus among scholars. Some propose that the Sphinx had a religious significance, representing a deity or embodying the pharaoh’s divine connection. Others suggest it had an astronomical purpose, aligning with celestial events or serving as an astronomical marker.

What is the history behind the excavation and discovery of the monument?

The excavation and discovery of the Great Sphinx of Giza involved a combination of ancient and modern efforts, spanning several centuries. Here’s an overview of the key milestones in the exploration and unearthing of this iconic monument:

Ancient Rediscovery: It was likely buried in the sand for centuries following its construction during the Old Kingdom. The precise reasons for its burial remain uncertain. However, during the New Kingdom (16th century BCE), pharaohs such as Thutmose IV and Amenhotep II conducted excavations to uncover the Sphinx. Inscriptions found near the monument suggest that Amenhotep II may have undertaken restoration work to repair its damaged body.

Napoleon Bonaparte’s Expedition: In 1798, during Napoleon Bonaparte’s campaign in Egypt, a team of scholars and scientists accompanied the French army. These individuals, known as the Commission des Sciences et des Arts, documented and studied various aspects of Egypt, including the Sphinx. Their work helped disseminate knowledge about the monument to a broader European audience.

First Major Excavation: In the early 19th century, under the direction of Italian archaeologist Giovanni Battista Caviglia, significant excavation efforts were undertaken around the Sphinx. These explorations aimed to uncover the lower portions of the monument, reveal its body, and clear the surrounding area. However, due to limited resources and technical challenges, the excavation progress was relatively modest.

Emile Baraize’s Work: Emile Baraize, a French engineer and archaeologist, conducted extensive excavations at the Giza Plateau from 1925 to 1936. His efforts focused specifically on the Sphinx and its surroundings. Baraize’s work revealed various aspects of the monument, including its temples, causeway, and the Sphinx Temple located in front of the statue.

Modern Research and Surveys: In recent years, modern technologies have been employed to study the Sphinx and its surrounding area. Remote sensing techniques, such as ground-penetrating radar and laser scanning, have been utilized to explore hidden chambers, tunnels, and potential subsurface features associated with the monument. These investigations have contributed to our understanding of the Sphinx’s complex and evolving history.

The excavation and ongoing research surrounding the Great Sphinx of Giza have helped uncover new insights into its construction, purpose, and historical context.

While many questions about the monument remain unanswered, continued efforts in archaeological exploration and scientific analysis offer the promise of unraveling further mysteries surrounding this ancient wonder.

What are the main characteristics of the monument?

The Great Sphinx of Giza possesses several distinct characteristics that make it an extraordinary and iconic monument. Here are the main features and characteristics of the Sphinx:

1. Composite Creature: The Sphinx is a composite creature with the body of a lion and the head of a human, typically believed to represent the pharaoh Khafre or a deity associated with kingship. This blending of human and animal features symbolizes power, wisdom, and divine authority.

2. Monumental Size: The Sphinx is an enormous statue, measuring approximately 73 meters (240 feet) in length, 20 meters (66 feet) in height, and 19 meters (62 feet) in width. It is carved from a single piece of limestone, making it the largest monolithic statue in the world.

3. Limestone Construction: The Sphinx is made primarily of limestone, a prevalent material in ancient Egyptian architecture. The limestone blocks were quarried from the Giza Plateau itself, near the Sphinx’s location.

4. Facial Features: The face of the Sphinx is one of its most recognizable features, with distinct human-like characteristics. The facial details, including the prominent eyes, prominent cheekbones, and strong, slightly smiling mouth, convey a sense of majesty and mystery.

5. Headdress: The Sphinx originally bore a headdress known as a nemes, similar to the one worn by pharaohs in ancient Egypt. However, erosion and damage have significantly affected the state of the headdress, making its original appearance less discernible today.

6. Frontal Orientation: The Sphinx is situated on the Giza Plateau, facing directly towards the east, aligned with the rising sun. This frontal orientation is believed to symbolize the sun god and signify the connection between the pharaoh’s power and divine entities.

7. Surrounding Structures: The Sphinx is located within a larger complex that includes the Valley Temple, Sphinx Temple, and the pyramids of Giza. These structures form an interconnected network of religious and funerary elements, likely associated with the pharaoh’s mortuary rituals and beliefs.

Its size, unique form, and powerful presence make it a remarkable testament to the artistic and architectural achievements of the ancient world.

What is the significance and legacy of the monument?

The Great Sphinx of Giza holds immense significance and has left a lasting legacy that extends far beyond its physical presence. Here are some key aspects of its significance and legacy:

1. Symbol of Ancient Egypt: The Sphinx is an enduring symbol of ancient Egyptian civilization. It represents the grandeur, power, and cultural achievements of the ancient Egyptians, particularly during the Old Kingdom period. It has become an icon that embodies the mystique and wonder associated with ancient Egypt in the collective imagination of people worldwide.

2. Royal Power and Divinity: The Sphinx’s association with pharaohs and its composite form of a lion and a human symbolize the connection between royal power and divinity. It reflects the belief in the pharaoh’s divine authority and their role as the intermediary between the gods and the people. The Sphinx’s presence near the pyramids emphasizes its association with the pharaoh’s eternal afterlife and funerary rituals.

3. Architectural and Engineering Marvel: The Great Sphinx showcases the extraordinary architectural and engineering skills of ancient Egypt. Its colossal size, precise craftsmanship, and the ability to carve it from a single limestone block are a testament to the ingenuity and mastery of ancient Egyptian builders. The Sphinx serves as a testament to the advanced construction techniques employed by the civilization.

4. Cultural and Historical Importance: As one of the most recognizable ancient monuments, the Sphinx has become an integral part of Egypt’s cultural heritage. It attracts millions of visitors each year, contributing to tourism and serving as a symbol of national pride. The Sphinx’s historical importance lies in its association with the pharaohs, providing valuable insights into ancient Egyptian religion, art, and society.

5. Archaeological Significance: The Sphinx has been a subject of archaeological exploration and research for centuries. Excavations and studies surrounding the monument have revealed valuable information about ancient Egyptian civilization, including its religious practices, burial rituals, and architectural techniques. Ongoing research and investigations around the Sphinx continue to contribute to our understanding of ancient Egypt.

6. Inspiration for Art and Literature: The enigmatic allure of the Sphinx has inspired numerous artistic representations, literary works, and popular culture references throughout history. Its imposing presence and aura of mystery have captivated the imaginations of artists, writers, and filmmakers, contributing to its enduring presence in the collective consciousness.

Just like the Mask of Tutankhamun and the Rosetta Stone, the Great Sphinx of Giza has become an enduring symbol of ancient Egypt’s history.

Subscribe now

Refer a friend

Refer a friend

In this article, we shall discuss one of the most famous and iconic ancient artifacts ever discovered, the Rosetta Stone, with the help of a few questions.

What is the Rosetta Stone?

The Rosetta Stone is an ancient artifact discovered by a French soldier in 1799 in the Egyptian town of Rosetta (modern-day Rashid) during Napoleon Bonaparte’s campaign in Egypt.

It is a slab of black basalt measuring approximately 1.14 meters in height and 0.72 meters in width. The stone is inscribed with a decree issued by King Ptolemy V in 196 BCE, written in three scripts: Egyptian hieroglyphs, Egyptian Demotic script, and ancient Greek.

The significance of the stone lies in its trilingual inscription. At the time of its discovery, ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs were undecipherable, as the knowledge of how to read them had been lost for centuries. However, Greek was a known language, providing a crucial key to understanding the other two scripts.

The Rosetta Stone gained immense significance due to the opportunity it provided for deciphering ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs. Scholars and linguists recognized that if they could decode one of the known scripts, such as ancient Greek, they could then use it as a reference to unlock the meanings of the hieroglyphic and Demotic texts. This realization sparked a renewed interest in the study of ancient Egyptian language and culture.

Who deciphered the text inscribed on the stone?

The Rosetta Stone was deciphered by French scholar Jean-François Champollion. He is credited with the groundbreaking achievement of successfully deciphering the hieroglyphic script on the Rosetta Stone in 1822.

Champollion dedicated several years to the study of ancient Egyptian language and writing systems. By comparing the Greek text on the stone with the hieroglyphic and Demotic texts, he made significant progress in identifying phonetic values and deciphering the meaning of hieroglyphic symbols.

His work paved the way for the understanding of ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs and greatly advanced the field of Egyptology. Champollion’s decipherment of the Rosetta Stone remains one of the most significant contributions to the study of ancient Egypt.

What is inscribed on the stone?

The Rosetta Stone is inscribed with a decree issued by King Ptolemy V in 196 BCE. The decree is written in three different scripts: Egyptian hieroglyphs, Egyptian Demotic script, and ancient Greek. The inscriptions on the stone convey the same message, but in different languages and scripts to ensure its understanding by a wider audience. Here is a summary of the decree’s content:

1. Egyptian Hieroglyphs: The hieroglyphic section of the Rosetta Stone contains the official royal text of the decree. It begins with the phrase “The decree that the priests wrote on the stela of hard rock” and goes on to praise King Ptolemy V for his achievements and virtues. The hieroglyphic inscription also mentions various religious and political events, grants tax exemptions to the priests, and emphasizes the importance of honoring the king.

2. Egyptian Demotic Script: The Demotic section of the stone is a translation of the hieroglyphic text into a script that was commonly used for administrative and everyday purposes in ancient Egypt. It provides a more accessible version of the decree for the broader Egyptian population.

3. Ancient Greek: The Greek section of the Rosetta Stone is a translation of the decree, intended for the Greek-speaking administrators in Egypt at the time. It was the only script that scholars of the 18th and 19th centuries could read, which played a crucial role in deciphering the hieroglyphs. The Greek translation mentions that the decree was issued during the reign of Ptolemy V and includes similar praise for the king’s accomplishments.

The stone’s trilingual nature enabled linguists like Jean-François Champollion to make comparisons between the known Greek text and the unknown Egyptian scripts, ultimately leading to the decipherment of hieroglyphs and the unlocking of ancient Egyptian knowledge.

What are the main characteristics of the stone?

The Rosetta Stone possesses several notable characteristics that contribute to its historical and archaeological significance. Here are some of its key characteristics:

1. Material: It is made of black basalt, a hard and durable volcanic rock. This material has helped preserve the inscription and ensured the stone’s survival over the centuries.

2. Size: It measures approximately 1.14 meters in height, 0.72 meters in width, and 0.28 meters in thickness. Its large size allows for the extensive inscription and makes it a prominent and visually striking artifact.

3. Trilingual Inscription: Its most remarkable characteristic is its trilingual inscription. It contains three different scripts: Egyptian hieroglyphs, Egyptian Demotic script, and ancient Greek. This unique feature proved crucial in deciphering the hieroglyphs, as the Greek text served as a key to understanding the other two scripts.

4. Surface Inscription: The inscription on the Rosetta Stone covers the entire front surface of the slab. The texts are carved deeply into the stone, ensuring their longevity and readability.

5. Hieroglyphic Symbols: The hieroglyphic section of the inscription includes a range of Egyptian hieroglyphs, representing various objects, animals, and symbols. These symbols exhibit the complex and pictorial nature of the hieroglyphic script used in ancient Egypt.

These characteristics collectively make the Rosetta Stone an extraordinary artifact.

Where does the Rosetta Stone reside today?

The Rosetta Stone is currently housed in the British Museum in London, United Kingdom. It has been part of the museum’s collection since 1802 when it was acquired after the British defeated Napoleon Bonaparte’s forces in Egypt.

The British Museum has been the custodian of the stone for over two centuries and has displayed it prominently, allowing visitors from around the world to see this iconic artifact.

What is the significance and legacy of the Rosetta Stone?

The significance and legacy of the Rosetta Stone are multifaceted and far-reaching.

It provided the key to understanding the intricate hieroglyphic script. Before its discovery, hieroglyphs were undecipherable, and their meaning had been lost for over a thousand years. The stone’s trilingual inscription, including the hieroglyphs, Demotic script, and ancient Greek, allowed scholars to decipher the hieroglyphic text and unravel the secrets of ancient Egyptian writing.

The decipherment of the stone marked a turning point in Egyptology. It enabled scholars to translate numerous other ancient Egyptian inscriptions, texts, and documents, expanding our knowledge of ancient Egypt’s history, religion, literature, art, and daily life. It shed light on the rulers, rituals, beliefs, and administrative systems of this ancient civilization.

Regarded as one of the most significant and famous historical artifacts yet discovered, the iconic stone managed to capture the imagination of people worldwide. It has become an educational tool, inspiring curiosity and interest in ancient history and archaeology.

Along with Tutankhamun’s Mask, the Rosetta Stone symbolizes the rich and complex history of ancient Egypt.

Today, its significance resonates beyond the field of Egyptology, reminding us of the enduring value of studying our past and the rich tapestry of human civilization.

Interested in learning about other iconic artifacts?

Check out the following article:

1. Mask of Tutankhamun: Ancient Egyptian Artifact

   ---

Refer a friend

Refer a friend

The Mask of Tutankhamun is one of the most famous and celebrated symbols of ancient Egypt, and it is considered one of the most important discoveries of all time.

In this article, we shall discuss this iconic artifact with a few questions.

What is the Mask of Tutankhamun?

The Mask of Tutankhamun is a gold funerary mask of a certain 18th Dynasty ancient Egyptian pharaoh named Tutankhamun, often referred to as the Boy King.

This death mask, which weighs over 10 kilograms and is 54 centimeters tall, bears a likeness to the Egyptian god of the afterlife, Osiris, and is decorated with semi-precious stones.

Today, the Mask of Tutankhamun is the most famous and significant symbol of ancient Egypt as well as one of the best-known works of art in the world.

Who was Tutankhamun?

There is obviously no point in learning about a death mask without really knowing anything about the person for whom it was made and because of whom it is considered so important and valuable.

The death mask, as mentioned above, was made for Tutankhamun, the 13th pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty of ancient Egypt. Tutankhamun was born sometime around 1341 BC and died only 19 years later, sometime around 1323 BC.

Even though he lived for only 19 years, he ruled over Egypt for almost 10 years, from the age of 9 up until his sudden death at the age of 19. Hence, he is at times referred to as the Boy King.

It is better for us not to go into too much detail as to who was Tutankhamun’s predecessor before he ascended the throne, for that is a subject still debated by scholars. Some say it was Akhenaten, the 10th ruler of the 18th dynasty who ruled during the Amarna Period. Akhenaten is also speculated to be Tutankhamun’s father, but we cannot say that for certain either.

Other scholars speculate that Tutankhamun was most probably preceded by the female pharaoh Neferneferuaten, who briefly ruled over Egypt toward the end of the Amarna period. After she died sometime around 1332 BC, Tutankhamun ascended the throne, they say.

However, one cannot be so certain when it comes to the chronology of his predecessors and his genealogy, for things back then were more complicated than we might think. Many pharaohs ruled with co-regents at the same time, like Akhenaten, whose co-regent was Smenkhkare.

The most common theory is that after Akhenaten’s death, Smenkhkare briefly became the sole ruler of Egypt. Smenkhkare was succeeded by Neferneferuaten after his death. And Neferneferuaten was succeeded by Tutankhamun after her death.

Needless to say, this theory is still up for speculation and debate, so we must take it with a grain of salt.

Tutankhamun was way too young to become the pharaoh of Egypt at the mere age of 9, and a lot of the major changes and reversals in Akhenaten’s policies undertaken by him were most probably instigated by his adult advisors.

He undertook several significant societal changes during his almost 10-year reign, such as restoring the traditional polytheistic form of ancient Egyptian religion, thereby undoing the religious shift known as Atenism or Aten religion founded by Akhenaten.

Tutankhamun reversed many other societal changes initiated by Akhenaten and even moved the royal court away from Amarna, which Akhenaten had chosen as his capital.

Over his decade-long reign, Tutankhamun became one of the few pharaohs who was worshipped as a deity during his own lifetime, something which usually happened posthumously for most pharaohs.

He was venerated and honored with temples and mortuary cults while he was still alive, which was a rare occurrence. Temples of his cult were built as far away as Faras in Nubia and Kawa, now in Sudan. A stele discovered at Karnak, near Luxor, which is dedicated to him, indicates that he was probably appealed to for forgiveness and to free the petitioner from an ailment caused by sin.

The pharaohs of Egypt were believed to hold divine office, acting as a link between the Gods and the common man.

Today, Tutankhamun is mainly known for the immense amount of wealth found in his tomb, when the tomb was discovered in a near-intact condition in 1922.

The exact reason for his sudden death at such a young age is not known yet, although it is generally agreed upon that he suffered from poor health and was a weak boy. He is believed to have suffered from several illnesses, including scoliosis, several strains of malaria, and other issues such as a broken leg.

A combination of all his illnesses was probably what led to his sudden death at the young age of 19.

Where and when was the mask discovered?

The tomb of Tutankhamun was discovered at the Theban Necropolis in the Valley of the Kings in 1922, in an expedition led by British archaeologist and Egyptologist Howard Carter.

The discovery of Tutankhamun’s tomb is considered one of the greatest and most significant archaeological discoveries of all time. The tomb was discovered in a near-intact condition as it was hidden by debris for thousands of years, preventing it from being robbed by graverobbers, a fate the tombs of most other pharaohs have suffered.

Although the tomb was discovered in 1922 and opened in 1923, it took the excavation team another two years to be able to open the heavy sarcophagus which contained Tutankhamun’s mummy.

It was only in October 1925 that the excavation team opened the innermost of three coffins and found the gold death mask, which was seen for the very first time in around 3,250 years.

In December 1925, the mask was removed from the tomb and transported to the Egyptian Museum in Cairo for public display, where it rests to this very day.

What are the characteristics of the mask?

The mask is measured to be 54 centimeters (that is 21 inches) tall, 39.3 centimeters (that is 15.5 inches) wide, and 49 centimeters (that is 19 inches) deep, and is fashioned from two layers of high-karat gold.

It is mainly made of copper-alloyed 23-karat gold, while the surface of the mask is covered with a thin layer (approximately 30 nanometers) of two different alloys of gold, that is, a lighter 18.4 karat shade for the neck and face, and 22.5 karat gold for the rest of the mask.

The mask symbolizes the god of the afterlife, Osiris, and bears a resemblance to Tutankhamun’s features as found on his coffins and statues in the tomb. It includes a nemes headcloth, which is the striped headcloth worn by pharaohs in ancient Egypt, with the royal insignia of a cobra and vulture at the top.

The gold mask is inlaid with gemstones and colored glass, such as obsidian for the pupils, lapis lazuli for the eyebrows and eye surrounds, quartz for the eyes, etc.

Another important feature of the mask is the narrow gold beard inlaid with blue glass to give it a plaited effect. When the mask was discovered in 1925, the beard was found to be separated from the mask. It was reattached only in 1944 using a wooden dowel.

The mask also features a triple-string necklace of gold and blue faience disc beads with uraeus clasps and lotus flower terminals.

Moreover, a protective spell from the Book of the Dead, an ancient Egyptian funerary text, is inscribed with Egyptian hieroglyphs on the shoulders and back of the mask in 10 vertical and 2 horizontal lines.

What is the legacy of Tutankhamun’s mask today?

As mentioned earlier, today the mask of Tutankhamun is regarded as the most famous and significant object and symbol of ancient Egypt. It is also widely considered one of the most important and popular works of art in the world, one that inspires awe and admiration among people.

The mask not only symbolizes the richness of ancient Egypt but also represents the complex and advanced creativity and craftsmanship of the people of ancient Egypt, which inspires reverence even today. It also helped to stir up interest in the rich and complex history of Egypt, prompting scholars to study its history and culture in even more depth than ever before.

Tutankhamun’s mask is now considered one of the most important and iconic historical artifacts ever discovered, thereby cementing Tutankhamun’s rich legacy for centuries to come.

Refer a friend

Refer a friend

I am quite sure not many outside of France have heard of the name Alfred Dreyfus. In France, however, Dreyfus is often regarded as the most famous victim of injustice, antisemitism, and military and government corruption in the history of modern France.

Now, I am no doubt taking some liberty in describing his life as tragic, for I cannot say so for sure, and neither can anyone else except Dreyfus himself. Maybe, for all we know, Dreyfus never considered his life to be tragic.

However, for most of us out there who have only heard or read of the infamous Dreyfus Affair, his life, or at least part of it, could very well be described as tragic.

In this article, we shall take a brief look into the life of Alfred Dreyfus and the infamous Dreyfus Affair that has, unfortunately, gone on to define his life for eternity.

Alfred Dreyfus was a French artillery officer, who was born on 9th October 1859 in the city of Mulhouse, Alsace in the French Empire. Dreyfus was born into a Jewish family and was the youngest of nine children of Jeannette and Raphael Dreyfus.

Dreyfus’ father was a wealthy textile manufacturer and the family lived a comfortable life in Alsace. However, in 1870, when Dreyfus was 10 years old, things took a turn for the worst with the outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War, which led to the annexation of Alsace-Lorraine by Germany.

The annexation of his birthplace forced his family to move to Basel in Switzerland, where he began attending high school. This experience became a turning point in his young life, prompting him to pursue a military career.

Once Dreyfus turned 18 years old, he enrolled at the prestigious École Polytechnique military school in Paris. There he was educated in engineering and science and received military training.

Three years later, in 1880, he graduated from the school and was commissioned as a sub-lieutenant in the army.

Thus began Dreyfus’ military career. Little did he know that this very military career he so desired would one day get him involved in one of the most dramatic and polarizing events in the history of modern France, all against his own will.

After graduating, Alfred Dreyfus spent the next two years receiving specialized training as an artillery officer at the artillery school in the commune of Fontainebleau. After graduating from there in 1882, Dreyfus, aged 23, was assigned to the 31st Artillery Regiment in Le Mans.

Shortly thereafter, he was transferred to Paris to serve in the mounted artillery battery of the First Cavalry Division.

Dreyfus slowly began climbing up the military ladder, being promoted to lieutenant in 1885, then serving as adjutant to the director of the Bourges Establishment, which was a government arsenal, and then eventually promoted to captain.

In April 1891, Dreyfus, aged 31, married Lucie Eugenie Hadamard, aged 20. The couple would go on to have two children together. Lucie would become Dreyfus’ greatest supporter and defender during and after the Dreyfus Affair. She would defend his honor until the end of her life.

In 1893, Alfred Dreyfus graduated from the War College, which was the senior most military education institute and staff college of the French army. Dreyfus stood ninth in class and graduated with an honorable mention.

He was then commissioned as a trainee in the army’s General Staff headquarters, where he was the only Jewish officer. His Jewish ancestry was now proving to be a hindrance in his military career, often working against him.

The first incident occurred during his time at the War College, where he and another Jewish student, Picard, were intentionally given poor marks for likability, with the excuse that Jews were not desired on the staff.

Dreyfus and Picard both filed a complaint with the director of the college. The director expressed his regret over the incident but said that he was unable to help them in the matter.

To make matters worse, filing the complaint would go on to work against Dreyfus in the future. The panel member who gave him poor marks for being Jewish, General Bonnefond, managed to influence several of Dreyfus’ superiors against him. Although Dreyfus was considered an intelligent trainee, he gained a reputation for having a bad personality.

This reputation of his and the prejudice already existing against him would serve as the base and fodder for what was to come next. From then on, everything went downhill for Alfred Dreyfus.

This was the background leading up to the Dreyfus Affair. Now let us look into the controversial affair itself.

It all began in 1894 when a harmless and unsuspecting French housekeeper working in the German Embassy in France found a torn-up handwritten note in a wastebasket. In the note was written a French military secret, written by a spy in the French army.

Further investigation by the French army’s counter-intelligence revealed that some information regarding new artillery parts was being communicated to the German military attache in Paris, Maximilian von Schwartzkoppen, by a high-ranking officer in the French army. It was suspected that the spy was most likely someone from the General Staff.

Due to Dreyfus’ existing reputation, and also probably the fact that he was Jewish, he became the primary suspect for this act of treason and was arrested on 15th October 1894 without any evidence. A secret court-martial was held in which he was convicted and then publicly stripped of his army rank.

All the formalities of cashiering were publicly carried out to the hilt by the French army. He was made to stand in the courtyard of the École Militaire in front of ranks of soldiers, while his rank insignia, braid, and buttons were cut off from his uniform and his sword broken. From behind the railings of the courtyard, an angry mob shouted abuses and insults at him.

After being publicly shamed and humiliated in this manner, Alfred Dreyfus was sentenced to life imprisonment in the penal colony of Cayenne, infamously known as Devil’s Island, located in the Salvation Islands of French Guiana. Needless to say, Dreyfus had become public enemy number one in France, condemned by the authorities and the common people as well.

Mind you, all this was without any concrete or reliable evidence against him, which no doubt makes one suspect that he was just a scapegoat.

However, over a year after he was imprisoned on Devil’s Island, his case took an interesting turn.

In August 1896, the new chief of French Military intelligence, Lieutenant Colonel Georges Picquart, discovered concrete evidence that proved the real culprit of the treason was a Major named Ferdinand Walsin Esterhazy, and not Alfred Dreyfus.

Considering this information to be of great importance, Picquart reported his discovery to his superiors in the French army. However, instead of seriously considering the evidence, his superiors transferred him to the city of Sousse in Tunisia in November 1896 in an attempt to silence him.

Moreover, instead of clearing Dreyfus from the false charges based on which he was convicted, Major Huber-Joseph Henry went as far as to forge documents in order to prove Dreyfus was guilty.

The matter would have died down if it were not for Picquart’s lawyer, who communicated Picquart’s discovery to Senator Auguste Scheurer-Kestner, who took up Dreyfus’ case and spoke of it publicly.

Now the scandal was made public and was no longer dealt with in secrecy by the French army. Reports of Dreyfus’ innocence and a cover-up by the army were leaked to the press, leading to public outrage and dividing public opinion.

Intellectuals, artists, and writers expressed their outrage over the actions of the army, which sparked debates on antisemitism as many were convinced that Dreyfus was made a scapegoat because he was Jewish.

Under pressure from the press and the public, the army held a closed court-martial in which Esterhazy was tried and acquitted. Following the verdict, Esterhazy fled to England to lay low while the controversy raged on in France. In England, Esterhazy admitted to The Observer’s editor, Rachel Beer, that he was the one who had written the note and was guilty of treason.

Beer published the interview in September 1898, in which she reported Esterhazy’s confession. She also wrote a column in which she accused the French military of antisemitism and called for a retrial for Dreyfus.

Esterhazy would remain in hiding in England for the rest of his life, continuing to write in antisemitic papers.

In the meanwhile, Picquart was detained by the French army on grounds of violating professional secrecy for communicating his discovery through his lawyer.

Two days after Esterhazy was acquitted in the secret court-martial, writer Emile Zola risked his career by publishing an open letter titled, J’Accuse…!, to President Felix Faure, on the front page of the Paris daily L’Aurore.

Zola was a leading public figure in France by then and was voicing the outrage of French artists, writers, and intellectuals who believed that Alfred Dreyfus was innocent and a victim of antisemitism and corruption.

Zola’s intention for publishing the letter was to be tried for libel, which would give him an opportunity to bring forth to the general public all the new evidence that proved Dreyfus was innocent. His plan worked and he was put on trial twice and convicted both times, the first time being annulled on technical grounds.

Zola’s actions were not in vain and proved to be a major turning point in the case. Zola managed to flee to England before the verdict of his second conviction was out. He lived there in exile until matters calmed down in France.

In the meanwhile, Major Henry, who had forged documents against Dreyfus, was arrested for forgery and thrown in jail, where he died shortly thereafter.

Due to the ever-increasing pressure on the army and the government from all sides, the Supreme Court annulled the original verdict against Dreyfus and ordered a new court-martial. However, the anti-Dreyfus faction lobbied hard to make sure that Dreyfus was convicted again on 9th September 1899, despite the evidence of his innocence.

Alfred Dreyfus applied for a re-trial. The government agreed to offer him a pardon if he admitted to being guilty, but made it clear that they could not exonerate him completely. This was intended to be a compromise in order to cover up the army’s mistake.

Fed up with his persecution, and unwilling to go back to Devil’s Island if he refused the pardon, Dreyfus accepted the pardon even though he was innocent. By doing this, he officially remained a traitor but was released from prison.

For the next few years, Dreyfus lived in a state of house arrest in the commune of Carpentras with one of his sisters.

It was only on 12th July 1906 that Alfred Dreyfus, aged 46, was officially exonerated by a military commission, making him a free citizen.

This, in short, was the infamous Dreyfus Affair, a monumental event in the history of modern France.

The day following his complete exoneration, Alfred Dreyfus was not only readmitted into the army but was also promoted to the rank of major. And just a week later, he was made Knight of the Legion of Honour, after which he was commissioned to command an artillery unit at Vincennes, and then later on at Saint-Denis.

Although his life seemed to be getting back to normal, Dreyfus was not completely safe from the anti-Dreyfus faction yet. The situation got so tense that some of them decided to take matters into their own hands to get rid of Dreyfus.

On 4th June 1908, when Dreyfus was attending the ceremony relocating Zola’s ashes to the Panthéon, he was shot and wounded in the arm by a right-wing journalist named Louis Gregori. Gregori wanted to assassinate Dreyfus but failed to get a clean shot at him. Dreyfus was fortunate to get away with just a wounded arm.

Surprisingly, Gregori was acquitted by the court after defending himself by saying that he only wished to graze Dreyfus and had no intention of killing him.

Dreyfus’ time on Devil’s Island had taken a severe toll on his health. In 1907, he had been granted retirement from the army at the age of 48. However, at the onset of the First World War in 1914, Dreyfus rejoined the army as a major of artillery.

By the end of the war, he was a lieutenant colonel. And in November 1918, he was promoted to officer of the Legion of Honour.

Following his second retirement from the army, Dreyfus lived a quiet life away from the public eye.

On 12th July 1935, precisely 29 years to the date of his exoneration, Alfred Dreyfus died in Paris at the age of 75. Two days later, on Bastille Day, his funeral procession passed the major public square, Place de la Concorde, through the ranks of troops. He was interred at the Montparnasse Cemetery in Paris.

Since his death, Dreyfus has been honored and remembered in several ways, keeping his name and the infamous event associated with it in the memory of every French citizen and reminding them not to repeat the injustices Dreyfus had to suffer.

Statues of him have been erected in the courtyard of the Museum of Jewish Art and History in Paris as well as at the exit of the Notre-Dame-des-Champs metro station.

In October 2021, a museum dedicated to the Dreyfus Affair was inaugurated in Médan by President Emmanuel Macron.

To most of us, Dreyfus’ life, especially the years of the Dreyfus Affair and its immediate aftermath, might seem tragic and disturbing. None of us can imagine living a life where we have been accused of a crime we haven’t committed and then punished for it without any evidence.

One can hardly imagine how Dreyfus and his family must have felt during those dreadful, nightmarish years of injustice, how hopeless and helpless they must have felt, and how they must have coped with it all.

But as I mentioned earlier, even though the title of this article describes his life as tragic, I do not know for certain if Dreyfus felt the same. Maybe he had a whole different perspective of everything that happened to him and his family, one that possibly helped him cope with it better.

Refer a friend

Refer a friend

Idi Amin was a Ugandan military officer who served as the third President of Uganda from 1971 to 1979, after seizing power in 1971 with a coup d’etat that toppled President Milton Obote’s government. Amin declared himself President of Uganda and began ruling as a military dictator.

Needless to say, his rule was not democratic at all. Over the course of his presidency, Amin became known for his blatant human rights violations, persecution of political opponents, ethnic cleansing, corruption, extrajudicial killings, and several other serious crimes. It is estimated that between 100,000 and 500,000 people were killed under his rule.

However, in this article, we will be taking a look at just a minor aspect of his legacy, which involved the expulsion of Uganda’s Indian, or Asian, minority. For the sake of this article, we will be referring to Uganda’s Asian minority as Indians, for the large majority of them were of Indian descent.

Let us begin with a little background.

While Uganda was under British colonial rule from 1894 to 1962, the British brought thousands of Indians from British India as indentured laborers to work on the construction of the Ugandan Railway in the 1890s. Although the majority of the Indian indentured laborers made their way back to India after the construction of the railway was completed, a few thousand chose to stay behind.

To add to this Indian diaspora in Uganda, many Indians were brought over to Uganda by the British in order to serve as a buffer between Europeans and Africans. This Indian diaspora formed the middle rungs of administration and commerce in Uganda.

The British began to invest in the education of this Indian minority while neglecting the native Ugandans. Due to this, Indians began to be employed in administration, banking, and various other businesses.

By 1970, the majority of businesses and commerce in general in Uganda were run and dominated by the Indian minority. This resulted in a new status quo, wherein even after a decade of Uganda gaining its independence, the average Ugandan Indian was better off than the average native Ugandan.

And in spite of forming just one percent of Uganda’s population, the Indian minority was earning around one-fifth of the national income. Indian traders dominated Uganda’s commerce and economy and even received privileges from the existing tariff system which was geared to benefit them. They also had access to better residences, schools, and healthcare facilities.

The affluent Indian minority began living in gated ethnic communities, away from the natives, which gave rise to racial segregation. Though not all Indians in Uganda were affluent, most were much better off than the native Ugandans.

Naturally, this led to resentment and ill-will toward the Indian minority among the natives. Indians came to be referred to as dukawallas, which was initially an occupational term but was later used as an anti-Indian slur during Amin’s reign.

The native Ugandans saw Indians as traders who cheated customers for their own gain and only cared for their own community.

To curb the influence of the Indian minority, Obote’s government began formulating policies that encouraged the Africanization of Ugandan commerce and industry. These policies were Indophobic, and they sought to limit the role of Indians who were not Ugandan citizens in professional and economic activities.

These already-existing anti-Indian sentiments laid a perfect foundation for Idi Amin to build on. After seizing power in 1971, Amin ordered a review of the citizenship status given to the Indian minority, eventually coming to the decision that the ones already granted citizenship would be recognized, but all outstanding applications for citizenship would be terminated.

Although Amin did acknowledge the contributions of the Indian community to the economy and professions of Uganda, he also accused a minority of the Indian population of commercial malpractice, practicing racial segregation, and disloyalty. He also accused them of encouraging corruption and sabotaging Uganda’s economy.

All these anti-Indian sentiments in the government and among the native population culminated in Amin ordering the expulsion of Uganda’s Indian minority in August 1972. He gave them three months to leave the country regardless of their citizenship status.

Amin justified the expulsion by declaring that he was giving Uganda back to ethnic Ugandans. Needless to say, the order of the expulsion of the Indian diaspora was welcomed and celebrated by most native Ugandans.

Over 5,000 firms, estates, farms, and ranches were confiscated along with houses, goods, and vehicles.

The around 80,000 Indians that formed part of the Indian diaspora in Uganda, out of which around 23,000 were already citizens, had barely three months to flee the country and find asylum elsewhere.

A great number of the Indians in Uganda were actually originally citizens of the United Kingdom or its colonies, that is they were British subjects. The majority of them emigrated to the United Kingdom, while the remaining emigrated to India, Pakistan, Canada, Kenya, Malawi, West Germany, the United States, New Zealand, Australia, the Netherlands, Sweden, Mauritius, and several other countries.

Although shortly before the intended deadline Amin’s government exempted the Indians who were already granted citizenship from expulsion after some international outcry, the majority of them chose to leave anyway rather than face further persecution. Only a small minority of Indians chose to remain in Uganda.

The expulsion of the Indian population and the subsequent redistribution of property came to be known as Operation Mafuta Mingi.

However, such major events have major and serious consequences. The expulsion was not peaceful and in its resulting upheaval, Amin’s soldiers stole goods and engaged in physical and sexual abuses against the fleeing Indian population. Indians also faced restrictions in transferring or selling their private businesses.

Amin claimed that he wished to make the native Ugandan in charge of his own destiny and enjoy the wealth of the country. And by kicking the Indians out of the country, he wanted to transfer the economic control of Uganda into the hands of native Ugandans for the first time in the country’s history.

However, the true reason for his decision to expel the Indians is still at times debated and speculated. Some claim that Allah visited Amin in his dream and instructed him to expel the Indians, while others speculate that he did it to take revenge on the British government for refusing to give him arms in order to invade Tanzania.

Since neither of these claims can be confirmed or denied, we are left with no choice but to accept Amin’s own claim of why he did what he did.

Naturally, the expulsion drew severe international criticism of Amin’s government. The Indian government broke off diplomatic relations with Amin’s government and the United Kingdom held back the loan of a substantial amount promised to his government the previous year.

The expulsion policy was widely described as probably the most explicit and blatantly racist policy implemented in modern, post-colonial Africa.

The situation became more serious and urgent when Amin sent a telegram to the United Nations Secretary-General, Kurt Waldheim, indicating that he sympathized with the way Adolf Hitler treated the Jews.

This led to the United Nations taking the expulsion of Ugandan Indians more seriously, prompting them to immediately arrange an airlift for the refugees and send the Executive Secretary of the Economic Commission for Africa, Robert Gardiner, to negotiate with Amin and get him to reverse the policy. Not surprisingly, he failed in doing so and the exodus of Ugandan Indians continued.

Obviously, the countries to which the Indian refugees were emigrating were not that keen on having them. Tanzania and Kenya shut down their borders with Uganda to prevent the influx of more Indian refugees. British overseas territories such as Hong Kong, Solomon Islands, British Honduras, Bermuda, the Virgin Islands, and some others were also reluctant to permit Indian refugees to settle within their borders.

The only British territory that was receptive to the Indian refugees was the Falkland Islands.

The redistribution of property that took place after the Indians left Uganda mainly saw government officials and soldiers benefit from it, with most of it being allocated to high-ranking officials and government bodies. The state-owned Ugandan Development Corporation seemed to benefit the most from the redistribution after gaining control over some of the largest enterprises.

As Idi Amin’s rule continued over the years, many of the few Indians who stayed behind also left the country. Since Indians had dominated the commerce of the country, their expulsion resulted in a major brain drain in Uganda, thereby severely crippling Uganda’s economy.

Indians owned around 90% of Uganda’s businesses and accounted for around 90% of Uganda’s tax revenue. Therefore, in their absence, the country’s GDP fell by 5% between 1972 and 1975, while manufacturing output sharply declined over the years.

Although Indian businesses were handed over to native Ugandans, the Ugandans found themselves ill-prepared to run those businesses as they had no prior experience in running businesses. Further, the lack of educated, skilled, and experienced workers and technicians saw the industrial sector, which was the backbone of Uganda’s economy, crumble over the years.

It is estimated that in less than ten years following the expulsion of the Indians, the real value of wages and salaries dropped by 90% in Uganda.

Idi Amin was overthrown as President in 1979 after the war he declared on Tanzania backfired and resulted in Uganda’s capital city of Kampala being captured by the Tanzanian Army and the Ugandan National Liberation Army, which included Ugandan exiles.

By then, the damage was already done and Uganda’s economy was crippled and in dire straits.

In 1986, military officer Yoweri Museveni became the President of Uganda and invited Indians to return to Uganda after condemning Amin’s expulsion policies. He also acknowledged the role of Indians in the industrial and social development of Uganda.

Museveni’s sympathetic view toward the exiled Indian community and his reversion of Amin’s policies prompted many Indians to return to Uganda once again and set up their businesses, thereby assisting to rebuild Uganda’s struggling economy.

Refer a friend

Refer a friend

In this article, we will take a look at the class system in Tibetan society, a society not many would associate with such social stratifications given the influence and history of Buddhism in the region.

Tibetan society in general was divided into three primary social groups – monks (high), the nobility (medium), and the common people (low). The common people were further classified into two categories – peasants, and pastoralists who lived a nomadic existence.

The monks, that is the priestly class, were of course part of the highest class, with only the Dalai Lama being higher than them. This is something identical found in almost all cultures where such social stratifications exist, wherein the priests belong to the highest rung on the social ladder.

The nobility, high-ranking government officials, estate owners, and landholding peasants belonged to the middle class. While the landless peasants and nomadic pastoralists belonged to the lower class.

And the lowest of them all, who formed the bottom rung of the Tibetan class system, were the Ragyabpa. The Ragyabpa population were the untouchables of Tibetan society, who were mostly restricted to occupations that were regarded as impure, unclean, and polluting by Tibetan society, such as performing executions, butchering, tanning, skinning, blacksmithing, fishing, goldsmithing, disposing of corpses, prostitution, etc.

These jobs were considered unclean jobs and were looked down upon. And due to these jobs, the Ragyabpa were considered to be polluted.

It is said that even hermaphrodites and bachelors belonged to the lowest class.

Needless to say, it is generally assumed and accepted that the Dalai Lama was in the highest class possible in Tibetan society.

However, it is difficult to simply classify traditional Tibetan society merely into three broad categories. Unfortunately, things were more muddled up and complex than this.

Over the years, scholars have found that the law codes of the Tsangpa Dynasty and the Ganden Podrang system of government divided society into three main categories – high, medium, and low, with each category further divided into three more categories.

This social structure gave rise to nine classes in total, each adhered to and continued with hereditary. The descendants of one class would be born and would die in that very class, without any opportunities for advancement or climbing the social ladder. This social stratification had legal backing and legal consequences, and any citizen found to be disregarding this structure or its dictates could be punished by law.

In this social structure, the middle class formed the largest part of the Tibetan population, mainly comprising householders, taxpayers, landless and landholding peasants, and government officials.

This elaborate yet intricate structure ensured that the rich remained rich and the poor remained poor forever. The descendants of an untouchable would remain untouchables, the descendants of a farmer would remain farmers, the descendants of a landlord will remain landlords, and so on.

As per this nice-class system, even the nobility, monks, and high-ranking officials formed part of the middle class, with only the Dalai Lama belonging to the highest class. However, they formed the highest position of the middle class.

The high-ranking officials were appointed from members of the aristocracy, who were wealthy families in society just under the nobility. The monk officials were also appointed through hereditary or were second sons of the aristocracy, mostly from the Llama middle class.

These monks were not really monks of pure conduct as one would imagine, but were monks in name only. It is said that just a night in a monastery was enough for them to qualify as monk officials.

Then came the middle division of the middle class which included taxpayers, householders, and landless peasants.

The taxpayers were numerically the smallest group in this middle division, but they had a better social, economic, and political status than the other groups in the middle division and enjoyed a comfortable and high standard of living.

The taxpayers owned large estates, ranging from 20 acres to 300 acres in size, leased from the district authority with land titles. The main civil responsibilities of the taxpayers were to pay taxes and provide unpaid, sometimes forced, human and animal labor for limited periods of time to their district authority.

The householders were basically landholding peasants who held small plots of land that were legally individual possessions. However, the difference between the taxpayers and the householders was that the householders did not own land as a family corporation as the taxpayers did. Another distinguishing factor was that the descendants of householders had no guarantee of inheriting a piece of land, which was not the case for the taxpayers.

However, the householders had fewer duties compared to the taxpayers. They were only expected to provide the district authority with unpaid human labor and had to pay lighter taxes.

The lowest position in the middle division was reserved for the landless peasants, who had no heritable titles or rights to any land whatsoever. The landless peasants usually farmed on lands leased out from the taxpayers in return for working for those taxpayer families.

The landless peasants had the right to purchase relative freedom from their estate owners for an annual fee. This relative freedom allowed them to engage in other crafts and trades, something which the taxpayers and householders could not do.

However, this freedom granted to them depended solely on the discretion of the estate owner, and the owner had the right to not only revoke such freedom but even raise the annual fee of the peasant if he prospered or did well in some other trade. The owner could even ask the peasant to undertake some unpaid labor for a limited duration.

Unfortunately, the descendent of a peasant who had bought his freedom did not inherit that free status. Every descendant had to start all over again and buy their own individual freedom for an annual fee to the estate owner.

This rigid system ensured that the descendants of landless peasants had no opportunities to advance too high in society, and remained landless peasants indebted to their estate owner for life.

And then finally came the lowest division of Tibetan society, the one that included the household servants, untouchables, and slaves.

The household servants too suffered from the hereditary curse, which meant that the descendants of a household servant would also be household servants, with no opportunities for advancement. In short, a servant would remain a servant forever.

Then there were the untouchables of Tibetan society, the Ragyabpa, who were further divided into three categories, the lowest of them comprising executioners and the highest comprising goldsmiths. Other occupations performed by them such as butchering, tanning, skinning, blacksmithing, fishing, disposing of corpses, and prostitution all fell somewhere in between.

Due to the nature of their work, which was considered polluting, unclean, and impure, the Ragyabpa and their descendants were excluded from society.

The lowest division also comprised the slaves. Although slavery was never the most prominent aspect of Tibetan society, few scholars have claimed that slavery did exist in Tibet, though at a minimal level when compared to other societies. Very few Tibetans were believed to be held as slaves, and it is said that the little slavery that did exist was not as harsh and cruel as one would imagine.

To what extent this is true, one cannot say for sure. Contrary to most scholars, British scholar Sir Charles Bell, who was British India’s ambassador to Tibet and acclaimed Tibetologist, claimed that small children, mostly from the tribes that lived between Assam and Tibet, and south-eastern Tibet, were purchased from their poor parents and kept or sold as slaves.

However, other scholars have dismissed Bell’s claim. In fact, accounts of western visitors of Tibet, including some long-term residents such as British diplomat and Tibetologist Hugh Richardson, and Austrian mountaineers Peter Aufschnaiter and Heinrich Harrer, do not mention the practice or existence of slavery in Tibetan society.

These facts have led scholars to suggest that even if slavery did exist in Tibetan society, the 13th Dalai Lama, Thubten Gyatso, probably got rid of it during his reforms.

The class system in Tibet has been as good as non-existent since the 1959 Tibetan uprising against the Chinese government, which led to the 14th Dalai Lama fleeing Lhasa to find refuge in India.

Although the Tibetan class system was never as inhumane and cruel as some of its counterparts in other cultures, it was still a terrible social evil that needed to be removed from Tibetan society. Thankfully, it was removed, although the collateral damage was a significant one with the complete loss of Tibetan independence.

Refer a friend

Refer a friend

In my last two articles, I discussed the social evil of untouchability prevailing in India and Korea. Now, in this article, I would like to discuss the Cagots, who were a persecuted minority in France and in the north of Spain. One can say that the Cagots fall into the category of untouchables, equivalent to the Dalits of India and the Baekjeong of Korea.

I am quite sure not many outside of France have heard or know anything about the Cagots, and with this article, I hope to address that.

The Cagots were a group of people primarily from the west of France and the north of Spain, who were historically persecuted and discriminated against by the members of normal society. The Cagots are said to date back to as far as 1000 C.E. as per the most recent and updated evidence we have managed to acquire.

Mainly found in the regions of Bearn, Brittany, Gascony, the Navarrese Pyrenees, Aragon, Asturias, and the Basque provinces, the Cagots were called by different names depending on the region where they lived. For instance, in the regions of Armagnac, Anjou, and Languedoc they were called Capots or Gens des Marais (meaning Marsh People). In Bordeaux, they were called Cahets or Ladres. In the Spanish Basque country, they were known as Agotes. In the French Basque country, they were known as Agoth or Agotac. And in Brittany, they were called Caquots.

Unfortunately, the origin of the term Cagots, as well as the origin of the people referred to as Cagots remains uncertain and is still debated among scholars to this day. Needless to say, due to the lack of evidence regarding this subject matter, several theories and legends have sprung up to explain the origin of the Cagots. But more on that later.

Historically, the Cagots were victims of several discriminatory practices. They were restricted to a limited number of occupations such as carpentry, woodcutting, butchering, ropemaking, weaving, blacksmithing, woodcarving, masonry, making and operating instruments of execution, etc. These occupations were looked down upon in society by the general populace and were considered impure and polluting, therefore resulting in the ostracization of the Cagots.

The Cagots were prohibited from the following – touching food in the market, entering mills, selling wine and food, working with livestock, marrying a non-Cagot, joining the priesthood, entering public taverns, using public wells and fountains, having the same burial grounds as the non-Cagots, sitting with non-Cagots during a church service, entering a church through a door used by non-Cagots, walking barefoot on a common road, drinking from the same cup as non-cagots, having a surname in registers and records as their names usually carried the term Cagot after their first name.

Discrimination against the Cagots began from birth when the baptism of a Cagot child could only take place at night and no church bells were rung to celebrate their baptism, as was done for non-Cagot children. Even at church, the Cagots were either not given the eucharist or it was given to them with a wooden spoon.

In many regions, the Cagots were expected to wear cloaks with yellow trim or clothes with a goose foot either sewn into it or attached to it in order for others to identify them as Cagots. There were several other such discriminatory practices the Cagots were subjected to.

And due to all these restrictive practices and the limited number of occupations they were allowed to undertake, the Cagots found it impossible to integrate into normal society or find opportunities for advancement. All this led to them being socially excluded from society, compelling them to live in hamlets on the outskirts of villages.

The Cagots were said to be found in over 137 villages and towns and were part of around 40% of the communities outside the mountain regions. They usually lived outside the town or village walls or across rivers, separate from the rest of the population.

As the centuries passed by, things became worse for the Cagots as the discriminatory practices they were subjected to were eventually codified into French law in 1460, thereby legally depriving them of any social, civil, or political rights.

Similar to the tradition of untouchability in other cultures, the Cagots were not a distinct race or religious or ethnic group but looked the same as the non-Cagots, spoke the same language, and practiced the same religion as the rest of the population. In fact, many scholars have come to the conclusion that there is no definite evidence of any feature that made the Cagots different or unique in any way from the non-Cagots.

It is believed that a Cagot was identified as and referred to as a Cagot primarily because of their occupation and ancestry, with no other factor proving to distinguish them from the others. Again, much like the tradition of untouchability in other cultures, the descendants of Cagots were also identified as Cagots by birth, thereby limiting them to their few traditional occupations.

To make matter worse, rumors and myths were spread about them in society. They were accused of being cannibals, heretics, sexual deviants, lepers, sorcerers, cretins, werewolves, or simply evil.

They were also believed to be intellectually inferior to non-Cagots and thought to be afflicted with congenital disabilities. Many even believed that Cagots could make non-Cagot children sick merely by looking at or touching them.

Such perception of the Cagots and the oppression resulting from it lasted up until the 19th century when it began slightly changing and fading.

Let us now take a look at the different theories and speculations put forward to explain the origin of the Cagots.

Historically speaking, the origin theories for the Cagots go back to biblical times. According to one of the legends, the Cagots were descendants of the bricklayers who constructed Solomon’s temple after being expelled by God from ancient Israel on grounds of poor craftsmanship. However, not many details are known about this legend.

A slightly more detailed legend is that the Cagots were originally from Spain and were descendants of a Pyrenean carver who went to ancient Israel to cast Boaz and Jachin, two copper or brass, or bronze pillars that stood on the porch of Solomon’s temple. While casting the Jachin, he was distracted by a woman, which resulted in an imperfection in the pillar. This imperfection led to his descendants being cursed to suffer leprosy.

Many also believed that the Cagots were actually descendants of the carpenters who made the cross on which Jesus was crucified, which led them to be despised by society.

Now, you might be wondering if any of these legends are true and accurate or not. In all likelihood, they are probably not true. These explanations seem to be more like myths and made-up legends rather than factual theories. There is no evidence whatsoever to support these explanations and no grounds to accept them as the truth. Needless to say, one must not take these explanations seriously.

Another theory put forward was that the Cagots, who were commonly referred to as Cretins, Chistianos, or Chretiens, happened to suffer from a particular form of leprosy or a condition quite similar to it such as psoriasis during the medieval period. And as lepers were known as pauperes Christi during this period, it is speculated that this gave birth to the confusion between the terms Cretins and Christians.

If this confusion indeed did occur, then it could explain the similar restrictions and discriminations faced by both Cagots and lepers. And eventually, over the course of centuries, this confusion was what probably led to the belief that all Cagots suffered from leprosy and hence must be avoided. Even the Cagots who showed no signs of leprosy at all were considered lepers and were called white lepers who suffered from white leprosy.

This also led to the belief in Navarre that the Cagots were descendants of French immigrant lepers.

However, some edicts around the late 16th century make a distinction between Cagots and lepers, referring to them as different categories of undesirables or untouchables.

Many tried to attribute a fixed physical appearance to the Cagots, such as by believing them to be either dark and of Arab descent or white with blue eyes and blonde hair of Germanic descent. However, this was proved to be false when it was discovered that the Cagots were a diverse group of people with diverse physical appearances, just like the non-Cagots.

And since they could not be distinguished from the non-Cagots in physical appearance, rumors began circulating that the Cagots possessed webbed hands and feet or either had only one ear or no ears at all or that one ear was bigger or longer than the other. They were also believed to have goiters.

Obviously, these rumors were just rumors and nothing more. The fact that the Cagots, who were persecuted for centuries, had no distinguishing physical or cultural, or religious features at all when compared to the non-Cagots, is exactly what makes their persecution even more surprising and unfounded, and unjust.

The Cagots practiced the same religion as the non-Cagots in a particular region, which was mostly Christianity. In fact, the fact that the Cagots were referred to as Christianus, Crestiens, or Chrestia during Medieval times gave rise to the theory that they were actually pagans who were early converts to Christianity, but continued to be discriminated against by the people who were converted later on due to their pagan descent.

However, this theory too cannot be verified due to a lack of evidence. But if this particular theory were true, it is a shame to see how these early converts were treated by the Church and by society in general. The Church and the non-Cagot church-goers imposed strict, harsh, and humiliating restrictions on the Cagot church-goers.

Apart from being required to use a low side entrance reserved for them and sitting on terrible seats, the Cagots were also prohibited from using the general holy water fonts used by the non-Cagots and were required to have their own fonts just for the Cagots. This rule was so seriously followed that it is said that on one particular occasion when a rich Cagot dared to touch the font reserved for the non-Cagots, his hand was cut off and nailed to the church door as punishment as well as a warning for the other Cagots.

However, just as in the case of every historical subject, this particular theory is also often challenged by contradicting theories. Some scholars believe that the Cagots were possibly a culturally distinct community of woodsmen who were Christianized relatively late.

Again, who knows the truth? We cannot say for sure.

In 1515, after an appeal by a delegation of Cagots, Pope Leo X published a papal decree, asking that the Cagots be treated with kindness and equality as the other believers were treated. However, the decree resulted in no change of circumstances for the Cagots as the common people and the authorities ignored the decree and continued to discriminate against the Cagots.

But as the years passed by, certain mild improvements in the conditions and treatment of the Cagots took place as examinations by doctors during various periods revealed that Cagots were no different from non-Cagots in any way and did not suffer from leprosy or any other disease more than the non-Cagots.

This realization helped improve their status in governments and among the educated. The parliaments of Bordeaux, Pau, and Toulouse even allocated money for the betterment of the Cagots and called for tolerance toward the Cagots.

All these minor improvements, although good and positive, were merely superficial measures taken to alleviate the plight of the Cagots. The common people and even the local authorities continued to ignore these changes. In fact, in most regions, it was the educated, wealthy, and powerful citizens who advocated putting an end to the discrimination against the Cagots and called for them to be integrated into normal society.

In the 17th century, French statesman Jean-Baptiste Colbert even went as far as to officially free the Cagots residing in France from restrictions and from servitude to parish churches. Sadly, this measure too proved useless.

In 1723, the parliament of Bordeaux took the bold step of declaring a fine of 500 French Livres for any citizen who discriminated against or insulted Cagots or their descendants and gave strict instructions that the Cagots be treated with equality and be recognized as honorable citizens of society just like the non-Cagots in churches, government offices, galleries, assemblies, schools, colleges, etc.

This strict instruction greatly helped to stimulate some improvement in the lives of the Cagots. By the end of the French Revolution, during which substantial steps were taken to end the discrimination against the Cagots, the legalized restrictions the Cagots were subjected to were brought to an end and the practice of excluding and persecuting them fell into decline.

Although the stubborn common people of society tried to continue with this practice, its end was very near. By the late 20th century, this social evil had as good as come to an end, with very few occurrences taking place or reported.

Fortunately, in today’s contemporary world, the Cagots no longer exist as a separate social class at the bottom end of the hierarchy. And since the majority of them have more or less successfully integrated into normal society and have become a part of the general population, they no longer have to live in separate settlements across rivers or on the outskirts of villages and towns.

Even though things are not entirely perfect yet, the end of discrimination and this practice of untouchability against the Cagots serve as a great example to other cultures where such practices are still in existence to this very day. The end of the persecution of the Cagots means that such evil and inhumane social practices can be brought to an end in other cultures across the world as well. We can only hope that this happens soon.

Refer a friend

Refer a friend

In last week’s article, I addressed the issue of untouchability in India. As mentioned in that article, the concept of untouchability is not just peculiar to the Indian subcontinent but is a concept that exists in several other countries and cultures throughout the world.

In this article, we will look into the issue of untouchability in Korea. While in India the untouchable population is commonly referred to as Dalits, in Korea they are commonly referred to as Baekjeong.

Historically, the Baekjeong were people belonging to an untouchable caste in Korea. They were said to originate from some minority nomadic groups of disputed ethnicity, who were mostly settled in fixed communities in the early years of the Goryeo Period between 918 to 1392 AD. Goryeo was a Korean state established in 918 during a time of national division called the Later Three Kingdoms period and it unified and ruled the Korean Peninsula until 1392, thereby achieving, according to historians, true national unification.

Initially, during this period, the term Baekjeong was a neutral term used to refer to the common people. It was only much later, that is during the period of the Joseon Dynasty (which was the last dynastic kingdom of Korea), that the term came to have a derogatory connotation, taking on the role of an insulting title used to refer to the lowest classes of Korean society.

Much like in the case of the Dalits of India, this low position of the Baekjeong in society was most probably due to the occupations they practiced, such as butchery, performing executions, hunting, tanning, weaving baskets, and other such occupations that included animals and meat. These occupations were regarded as impure, sinful, and lowly in Korean society.

It is said that the Baekjeong, who lived in fixed communities and were mainly butchers by profession, became nomadic groups after the Mongol invasion of Korea. As they split up into different nomadic groups, the Baekjeong formed subgroups. And as the centuries rolled by, the term Baekjeong came to be increasingly used to insult and degrade another person.

However, the explanation for the origin of untouchability in Korea is not as straightforward as one might assume. Although the abovementioned theory is fairly popular and more or less accepted by scholars in general, it is not the only theory put forward to explain its origin.

According to the great Korean philosopher, poet, scholar, and agronomist Chong Yagyong, also known as Dasan, who was one of the greatest and most influential thinkers of the late Joseon period, the Baekjeong had Tatar origins. Tatar was a general term used to refer to all northern people, Manchurians, Mongols, etc.

In one of his works, Dasan attributes the origin of the Baekjeong to a nomadic group called the Yangsucheok, from the Goryeo period. The Yangsucheok were experts at hunting and butchering animals and weaving baskets.

However, being an unknown nomadic group and due to the nature of their occupations, the Yangsucheok found it difficult to be integrated into society and were discriminated against.

They were believed to have descended from either the Khitan people, who were a nomadic people from northeast Asia (modern-day areas of Northeast China, Russian Far East, and Mongolia), or the Jurchen people, who were East Asian Tungusic-speaking people (living in modern-day Northeastern China) and descendants of the Donghu people.

These nomadic groups were not registered in any national register of any province as they lived in temporary residences while moving across large areas.

As mentioned above, during the period after the Goryeo Dynasty, the term Baekjeong was not used for the lowest class of people in society. Scholars speculate that Baekjeong was originally a term used to describe a person who has no burden of duties, meaning a person, or a group of people who have not been granted any land as they were not given certain duties from the state.

However, their status began changing with the onset of the Joseon Dynasty when the 4th ruler of the Dynasty, King Sejong, consolidated several outcast groups with ordinary farmers, leading to the formation of a combined group of people referred to as Baekjeong. In a gesture of goodwill, King Sejong included them in the national register and gave them settlements to form fixed communities and land to cultivate. He even laid down policies to put an end to the discrimination faced by the Baekjeong.

Unfortunately, as in almost all cultures where untouchability exists, the common people themselves, that is the masses, had no desire to stop discriminating against the Baekjeong and their descendants. They continued discriminating on the grounds of history and tradition, disobeying the policies laid down by the king himself. To make matters worse, the government officials who were in charge of putting an end to this inhumane practice themselves had no desire or intention to do so. These officials too disobeyed the order of the king.

The common people looked down upon the occupations of the Baekjeong, considering them to be illegal, criminal, antisocial, unclean, impure, sinful, and despicable. While the majority of the people farmed for a living, the Baekjeong continued to undertake their primary occupations of butchering, weaving, tanning, dancing, singing, performing executions, etc.

A common Buddhist man in society believed such jobs to be below their status as a self-respecting individual, especially jobs that included animals, as they were thought to be sinful and polluting. This led to continued discrimination against the Baekjeong, making it almost impossible for them to integrate into normal society.

The lifestyle of the Baekjeong was considered a moral violation of Buddhist principles, and just like the Dalits of India, the Baekjeong were deprived of opportunities for advancement in society and were expected to do the same degrading jobs as dictated by tradition.

As the practice of untouchability became rigid and more inhumane in Korea, the Baekjeong came to be seen as polluted and impure people who were to be avoided as much as possible. They were prohibited from the following practices – drinking or smoking in the presence of members of the higher classes, having surnames, using titles or characters such as wisdom, righteousness, benevolence, etc. in their personal names, having the same burial grounds as the members of the higher classes, married women wearing a hair stick, riding a horse when marrying, wearing a horsehair hat, wearing leather shoes, wearing silk clothes, living in a roof-tiled house, and leaving their house without wearing a bamboo hat. They were also expected to lower themselves in front of members of the higher classes and common people.

There were several other restrictions and prohibitions they were subjected to, making it as good as impossible for them to assimilate into normal society.

Over the years, several policies were laid down and organizations established with the aim of bringing an end to the discrimination against the Baekjeong, the most notable reform being the Gabo Reform, which was a series of sweeping reforms suggested to the government in 1894. The Gabo Reform legally abolished the inhumane Korean caste system, thereby attempting to bring an end to the practice of untouchability in Korea.

However, in spite of the Korean caste system being legally abolished and rendered illegal, discrimination against the Baekjeong did not stop. They continued to be excluded from the workings of normal society. Their family registers were separate from the rest of society, with either a red dot or the word butcher marked against their names under occupation.

Even though the Gabo Reform was not as effective as it was intended to be, it did stimulate a gradual process of change in the conditions of the Baekjeong. The reform allowed the Baekjeong to become artists, scholars, or government officials if they had the ability to do so. Nevertheless, the majority of the Baekjeong were still confined to their traditional occupations that were considered unclean, impure, and polluting by others.

Organizations advocating the rights of the Baekjeong pushed for such progress and improvements and took the necessary actions for the same. They also acted as official representatives of the Baekjeong in legal matters.

A lot of these changes and reforms initiated for the social improvement of the Baekjeong were inspired by the Korean nationalist religion, Donghak, and Christianity. These religions introduced Korean society to the concepts of social equality and egalitarianism.

The Donghak peasants, hoping to put an end to the discrimination and unjust practices, began an armed movement in 1894 that came to be known as the Donghak Peasant Revolution, or the Donghak Rebellion, or the Donghak Peasant Movement. The rebel peasants used the values of the Donghak religion as a political ideology and sought equal rights for the lower classes in Korean society. Although unsuccessful, the rebellion inspired the Gabo Reform.

Christian missionaries also preached that all human beings were equal in the eyes of God, and they advocated putting an end to discrimination against the Baekjeong and other lower classes. The missionaries even attempted to include the Baekjeong in their worship services, resulting in protests from non-Baekjeong who claimed that such integrating measures were against traditional Korean society.

Although discrimination against the Baekjeong continued over the years, they began actively resisting and protesting against such discrimination by the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Many were jailed for refusing to follow what was traditionally expected of them, such as wearing or not wearing certain items of clothing.

The advent of industrialization and urbanization saw many Baekjeong lose their monopoly over their traditional occupations, especially butchering. The Japanese took control of the slaughterhouses and began to exploit the Baekjeong who worked as employees. This left many of the Baekjeong in financial distress.

Nevertheless, by the early 20th century, there were several educated and wealthy Baekjeong in Korean society, as well as several non-Baekjeong who desired the improvement of the Baekjeong. All these parts came together in an alliance to establish the Hyeongpyeongsa in 1923. The Hyeongpyeongsa was established to advocate the abolition of classes and of contemptuous appellations, promote mutual friendship among members, and enlighten the members. It also advocated communal fellowship and civil rights for the lower classes.

Over the years, the Hyeongpyeongsa underwent several changes in scope, aim, and vision, thereby broadening the movement. The young socialists in the organization have today gone on to form connections with other movements, focusing on economic and social injustices against the Baekjeong with a wish to create a more equal and egalitarian society in Korea.

Although the condition of the Baekjeong has improved over the years, the problem of discriminating against them still exists to this very day. The Baekjeong, and even their children in schools, continue to face discrimination by the authorities, higher classes, and common people.

Much like in the case of untouchability in India, the social evil of untouchability in Korean society continues to this day in spite of it being illegal and frowned upon. Several activists and organizations in Korea are working hard to rid Korean society of this inhumane practice at the earliest, however, such meaningful and permanent change may take several years to come about.

Needless to say, such a change can only take place if the people get rid of their regressive mentality and accept the Baekjeong as their equals.

Refer a friend

Refer a friend

Being an Indian born and raised in India and fairly educated in India’s history, Untouchability is not a rare or uncommon concept for me. Many people living in the south of Asia, and almost every single person inhabiting the subcontinent of India, have heard and are aware of the concept of untouchability.

For those of you who are completely clueless about the concept of untouchability, please read on, for this article aims to address exactly that.

So what exactly is untouchability? Well, to put it succinctly, untouchability is a form of social institution, a social practice, that legitimizes discrimination, exploitation, humiliation, and exclusion of certain groups of people who are deemed to be untouchables or pariahs or outcasts.

These so-called untouchables are considered the lowest of the low social group that undertakes the lowest of the low occupations such as cleaning, sweeping, skinning, washing, tanning, manual scavenging, fishing, etc. These jobs are generally regarded by upper castes as polluting or dirty activities, thereby leading to untouchables being regarded as polluted and dirty.

Now, although untouchability is a social evil found in many parts and cultures across the world, including in countries such as Tibet, Japan, Korea, China, Somalia, Nigeria, France, and Yemen, in this article we will only be discussing untouchability in the subcontinent of India.

In India, the institution of untouchability is closely associated with the rigid and dogmatic caste system, which originated in ancient India and continues up until this very day. The social evil of untouchability has been a part of Indian society for centuries now, stretching back to ancient times. It is the practice of ostracizing a group of people deemed untouchables due to their low position in the caste system. They form the lowest stratum of the Indian caste system.

In India today the untouchables are commonly referred to as Dalits, even though the official term assigned by the Constitution of India is Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The term Dalit means broken or scattered and is a self-applied term for anyone that falls outside of the traditional Hindu caste hierarchy.

In ancient India, these groups were excluded from the four-fold varna system of Hinduism as described in ancient texts such as Manusmriti. Varna refers to a social class in the hierarchical caste system, and Manusmriti ranks and describes the four varnas into which people were divided.

The first varna comprised the Brahmins, who were priests, Vedic scholars, and teachers. The second varna comprised the Kshatriyas, who were the rulers, warriors, and administrators. The third varna comprised the Vaishyas, who were farmers, merchants, and agriculturists. And the fourth varna comprised the Shudras, who were the servants and laborers.

These varnas, or classes, were considered to be idealized human callings. People falling into one of these four varnas were called savarna Hindus. While, on the other hand, people who did not fall into any one of the four varnas formed the fifth varna. This fifth varna, also known as the Panchama, included people whose jobs were considered polluting or dirty, such as manual scavengers, cleaners, sweepers, washers, fishermen, tanners, skinners, etc.

This fifth varna generally included the Dalits and the tribals, who formed the majority of the untouchable population. The people of the fifth varna were known as avarna Hindus.

This rigid social stratification ensured that the members of each varna and their descendants could only practice the occupations and perform the duties that fall into their varna, thereby making progress in society impossible for the untouchables.

The widespread practice of untouchability across the Indian subcontinent, especially in rural areas, enforced several restrictions on the untouchable community. For instance, the untouchables were prohibited from the following practices – entering places of public worship, using common village roads, using common public properties and resources such as ponds, taps, wells, temples, etc., wearing sandals or holding umbrellas in front of upper caste members, using the village cremation and burial grounds, entering the houses of upper caste members, marrying upper caste members, eating with upper caste members, sitting with upper caste members (even in schools), using the same utensils as the upper caste members, etc. They were subjected to social boycotts if they refused to perform their assigned duties and were also subjected to bonded labor.

Now, you might be wondering how did such an evil institution come into existence in the first place, wherein not only is the discrimination, exclusion, exploitation, and humiliation of fellow human beings legitimized but also encouraged on religious and spiritual pretexts? How did such an evil practice start and how and when did it obtain religious sanction?

Well, in all honesty, the birth of untouchability and its development in Indian culture and society is still debated to this day. Scholars have tried to explain its origins and its development with the help of the caste system, but this has only led to too many different theories and speculations, many of which often contradict each other.

Let us take a brief look at some of the theories put forward by scholars to explain the origin of untouchability. And what better person to start with than the great Indian social reformer and scholar Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, who is known as the Father of the Indian Constitution?

Ambedkar himself was born an untouchable and worked his way up with the help of education and hard work to become a great social reformer, economist, jurist, political leader, and scholar. His life would serve as an inspiration to millions of untouchables across the Indian Subcontinent.

According to Ambedkar, untouchability came into existence in Indian society sometime around 400 CE, mainly as a result of the struggle for supremacy between Brahmanism and Buddhism. He theorized that the practice of untouchability was a deliberate policy of the upper caste Brahmanas who despised the people who gave up and abandoned Brahmanism for Buddhism.

However, Ambedkar’s theory has been refuted by several scholars over the years on various grounds.

Prominent Indian scholars such as Vivekananda Jha, Suvira Jaiswal, and R.S. Sharma propose that untouchability was not an ancient practice but a later development in Indian society which came into existence after the solidification of the caste system sometime between 600 to 1200 AD.

To support his argument, Jha points out that no mention of untouchability can be found in the Rigveda, which is the earliest Vedic text. Even later Vedic texts do not reveal the existence of untouchability in the society of the time. It was only sometime between 600 to 1200 AD that groups labeled as untouchables begin to be mentioned in texts.

Scholars Jaiswal and Sharma suggest that untouchability as an institution came into existence when the aboriginal tribes came to be seen as impure by the privileged classes due to the nature of their means of livelihood, which usually included some form of manual labor, something that was looked down upon by the upper caste members of society. These aboriginal tribes were also looked down upon because of their low material culture.

And once these tribes were assimilated into the existing Brahmanical society, the privileged classes, in order to protect and assert their superior or higher status, began to dissociate themselves from the people of these tribes whom they considered to be inferior or lower in status. Over the years, these tribals became untouchables as the caste system grew more rigid and inhumane.

Another Indian scholar, Nripendra Kumar Dutt, proposed that the origins of the concept of untouchability lay in the pariah or outcast treatment of the indigenous people of India by the early Dravidians, who acquired the practice from Indo-Aryans.

These are not the only theories put forward by scholars though. Several non-Indian scholars have also proposed theories to explain the origin of untouchability.

For instance, British anthropologist John Henry Hutton suggested that untouchability began as a taboo on accepting food cooked by a person from a different caste, which may have been due to concerns regarding cleanliness. According to Hutton, this practice may have led to the taboo on inter-caste marriages as well.

However, this theory does not explain how and why certain social groups were isolated and deemed untouchables.

According to Austrian ethnologist, Christoph von Fürer-Haimendorf, untouchability came into existence as class stratification in the urban areas of the Indus Valley civilization, where poorer workers involved in unclean occupations such as tanning or skinning, or sweeping were segregated and banished outside the city limits. Gradually, over time, personal cleanliness came to be identified with purity and the concept of untouchability slowly spread to rural areas as well, where it was followed with more rigidity and seriousness. He further speculated that after the decline of the Indus Valley towns, these untouchables probably spread to other parts of India, thereby spreading the evil practice throughout the Indian subcontinent.

However, scholars such as Suvira Jaiswal have refuted this theory by stating that Christoph von Fürer-Haimendorf’s theory lacks evidence and fails to explain why the concept of untouchability is more pronounced in rural areas.

Unfortunately, all these above-mentioned theories were pieced together with whatever evidence was at hand. These explanations theorize and suggest and postulate, but none can yet be declared to be correct or accurate. Not surprisingly, these theories are partly, and in some cases largely, based on speculation. However, no doubt some of the theories put forward are more likely to be true, or close to the truth, than others.

It is difficult, and maybe even impossible, to pinpoint the exact period, reason, and manner in which the concept of untouchability came into existence. But until more concrete evidence has been discovered, we have no choice but to make do with the explanations we have managed to come up with.

Today, there are over 200 million Dalits inhabiting India, comprising around 16.6% of India’s population. Most of the Dalits live on the outskirts of villages.

After the Constitution of India came into force in 1950, the practice of untouchability in any form whatsoever was officially and legally abolished and made illegal. The Constitution gave Dalits the official terms of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. And the interests of such communities are advocated and looked after by several organizations and commissions, most notably the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.

Further, steps have been taken in public services and educational institutions for people belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes communities, such as guaranteed seats and quotas in educational institutions and at central and provincial levels of public services, as well as other concessions.

Now, this begs the question: Has the plight of the untouchables improved? Has the discrimination against them ended? Are they now treated respectfully and not exploited or humiliated? Do they have equal rights now?

The answers to these questions are mixed, somewhere in between yes and no. Although the situation and status of Dalits have improved a lot compared to the past, that is before the Constitution came into force, the truth is that discrimination against them still exists across India. If one pays attention to the news and happenings of contemporary Indian society, one would hear of disturbing instances of discrimination against what many upper caste members still consider untouchables.

The Dalits are still at times treated as outcasts, especially in the rural areas of India. They are still at times treated with contempt, and humiliated, exploited, and excluded from society, again mainly in rural areas, where the concept of untouchability and the caste system are still rigid and adhered to. Dalits are still at times beaten, harassed, and even killed by upper caste members for committing acts they are not supposed to do as per tradition. Many are still forced to practice the humiliating occupations of their ancestors and are denied opportunities for advancement.

Needless to say, this needs to stop. The discrimination the Dalits face must come to an end at any cost. Any and all religious or spiritual sanctions given to the institution of untouchability must be discredited and abandoned. The concept of untouchability did not, does not, and will never have any moral, spiritual, religious, social, or political force. Such an evil practice cannot be justified by any means, and it is time the people of India realize that this evil and inhumane practice of dehumanizing a fellow human being must be put to an end at the earliest.

Is this easier said than done? Of course, it is. To actually accomplish such a task will be quite difficult but not entirely impossible. It may take years, maybe even a century or two, to finally, completely, and absolutely rid our society of this evil practice.

There are several important, significant, and indispensable activists and organizations dedicating and sacrificing their entire time and energy to the cause of eradicating untouchability from Indian society. But to arrive at that stage someday in the future, the government and the people need to work together. The change must come from both ends, that is, from the top through legislation and severe punishment for continuing its practice, and from the bottom by educating and informing the masses and getting them to change their regressive mentality, especially in the rural areas where the practice of untouchability is still rampant and is in existence sometimes openly and sometimes in secret.

However, the people of India need to realize and understand that no matter how many laws are passed to prevent the continuation of untouchability and no matter how severe the punishments ascribed for breaking those laws, the real change shall only come when the people change their backward and inhumane mentality toward such marginalized groups.

True change in society can only come from the people that comprise it, not from external structures and institutions like governments.

Refer a friend

Listen to the audio version of this article.

Growing up anywhere around the world, I believe we have all heard of Stonehenge in some way or the other, either in school or through basic general knowledge. For the unaware folks out there who have never heard of Stonehenge, do not worry. This essay aims to address your curiosity while simultaneously looking into the mystery surrounding Stonehenge.

Often regarded as one of the greatest and most mysterious wonders of the world, Stonehenge is a prehistoric monument located on Salisbury Plain in Wiltshire, England, two miles west of the town of Amesbury.

Stonehenge consists of an outer ring of vertical sarsen standing stones, each around 13 feet (that is 4 meters) high, seven feet (that is 2.1 meters) wide, and weighing around 25 tons. These vertical sarsen stones are topped by connecting horizontal lintel stones. Inside the outer ring of sarsen stones is a ring of smaller bluestones, inside which are free-standing trilithons, two bulkier vertical sarsens joined by one lintel. The stones are set within earthworks in the middle of the densest complex of Neolithic and Bronze Age monuments in England and include several hundred burial mounds.

The monument is aligned toward the sunrise on the summer solstice. The stones are arranged in a way so as to display mirrored symmetry, with the only undisputed alignment to be found in that of the solstices, which can be regarded as the axis of that symmetry.

Stonehenge, although in ruins now, is one of the most famous monuments not just in the United Kingdom but throughout the world. It is a legally protected monument in Britain and was even deemed a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1986.

Now, you might be wondering when was Stonehenge constructed and why was it constructed in the first place. After all, what could possibly be the use of such a weird-looking stone structure?

Well, after countless hours of research and intense study of the monument, experts have come to a more or less unanimous conclusion that Stonehenge was built sometime around 3000 BC to 2000 BC. Now, I know that this is not a small range and might seem too vague for you to get an accurate idea of when it was constructed. But, unfortunately, it must be noted that Stonehenge was not built in a day, or even in a century for that matter. It was constructed over the course of several centuries.

If you came here looking for an exact date or year, I apologize, for an exact date and year do not exist.

The circular earth bank and ditch surrounding Stonehenge date back to about 3100 BC. The first bluestones of the inside ring are believed to have been erected sometime between 2400 and 2200 BC. However, it is speculated that these bluestones, though erected between 2400 and 2200 BC, may have been present at the site as early as 3000 BC.

Human bones that date back to 3000 BC, which was when the earth bank and ditch are believed to be first dug, have been found at the site. Such human bones dating back to around 2500 BC have been found at the site, thereby leading archaeologists to speculate that Stonehenge was possibly a burial ground from its earliest beginnings around 3000 BC, and continued to serve as one for another 500 years, that is up until around 2500 BC.

It is generally accepted that Stonehenge was constructed in several phases that spanned at least 1500 years. However, this too is not certain, for subsequent findings have provided evidence of some kind of large-scale construction at the site and around it that could extend the time frame to around 6500 years.

Unfortunately for us, Stonehenge was constructed by a civilization that left no written records, thereby making it difficult, maybe even impossible, for us to come up with completely accurate dates and details. Further, the dating and true understanding of the several phases that led to its construction is very difficult and complex due to poor quality and unreliable early excavation records, the absence of scientifically verified dates, and the disturbance of the natural chalk by periglacial effects and animal burrowing.

All these issues serve as major hindrances to acquiring accurate information and forming concrete, scientifically-proven conclusions.

You might wonder now what could possibly be the use of a bunch of stones put together in a seemingly random and haphazard manner. Well, unfortunately for you the answer to this question is still unknown and debated, and probably will always remain so. The answer to this question is, in all likelihood, lost to prehistoric history forever.

However, the lack of certainty regarding the matter has given birth to several fascinating myths and theories. Needless to say, these myths and theories are steeped in speculation and even fiction, ranging from scientific archaeological explanations to explanations from the paranormal and mythology.

Beginning with the early historians, who functioned at a time when science was not the driving factor in their research, it is quite evident that they were heavily influenced by supernatural and fantastical folktales while rendering their theories for Stonehenge.

Some early historians believed that the devil himself had constructed the structure, or at least ordered its construction. Some other historians believed that a mythical figure named Merlin, who is best known as a mage and who frequently features in the legend of King Arthur, was responsible for its construction.

The first known instance of Merlin’s association with the construction of Stonehenge can be seen in British cleric Geoffrey of Monmouth’s work, The History of the Kings of Britain, also known as On the Deeds of the Britons, which is a pseudohistorical account of British history written sometime around the year 1136. The work chronicles the lives of the kings of the Britons over the course of two thousand years.

As per the work, when Merlin was asked by King Ambrosius Aurelianus as to what might serve as an appropriate burial place for the dead princes of Britain, Merlin suggested that the king organize an army to go to collect magical stones from Mount Killarus in Ireland. Upon reaching Mount Killarus, when the soldiers attempted to remove the stones by using ropes, ladders, and other machinery, Merlin laughed at them and then proceeded to use his own machinery to remove the stones. After this, he commanded the soldiers to load the stones onto their ships to take them back to England, where they were then used to construct Stonehenge.

This was the first and original myth regarding Stonehenge that involved Merlin. When the medieval Norman poet Robert Wace translated Geoffrey’s original text into French, he added another detail that became part of the myth, which was that Merlin had ordered a giant to build Stonehenge for him.

This was how Merlin the mage came to be so closely associated with the myth and legend of Stonehenge.

As the centuries rolled by, more explanations for Stonehenge were put forward. For instance, in 1655, British architect and scholar John Webb suggested that Stonehenge was actually a Roman temple dedicated to the Roman sky God Caelus and that it was built following the Tuscan Order.

Some later commentaries proposed that the Danes, a North Germanic tribe inhabiting southern Scandinavia, had constructed Stonehenge. And up until the late 19th century, Stonehenge was attributed by some historians to the Saxons or some other relatively recent societies.

English antiquary John Aubrey was the first to propose that Stonehenge was built by the Druids, who were members of the high-ranking class in ancient Celtic cultures. They were religious leaders, political advisors, legal authorities, medical professionals, and practitioners of other high-status professions, and they left no written accounts.

Aubrey’s view gained traction and popularity when English antiquarian William Stukeley began to support and advocate this view.

Aubrey’s survey and study of the site and his analysis of the first measured drawings of the site led him to the conclusion that the arrangements of the stones had a calendrical and astronomical purpose, one that was difficult for us to decipher.

In the following century, Aubrey’s explanation gathered more momentum, especially among scholars who were looking for a deeper purpose behind the construction of Stonehenge, rather than just a burial site. Aubrey’s explanation provided them with this deeper purpose.

However, after undertaking the first accurate survey of the site in 1740, English architect John Wood suggested that the site was a place of pagan ritual.

It was only around the early 19th century that English scientist John Lubbock successfully proved that the site belonged to the Bronze Age after bronze objects were discovered in the nearby barrows during a survey.

However, the advent of science and technology in later years would prove several of these theories false and inaccurate. Radiocarbon dating of the site revealed that the construction of Stonehenge began around the year 3100 BC and ended around the year 1600 BC. This finding lays to rest and renders obsolete Aubrey’s theory that Stonehenge was built by the Druids, which by then had become the most popular theory.

The reason Aubrey’s theory was invalidated was that the Celtic society that the Druid priesthood were members of came into being only after the year 300 BC, a good 1300 years after the construction of Stonehenge was believed to have ended. Moreover, it is said that the Druids preferred to hold their rituals and sacrifices in the mountains or woods, and not on open fields.

The findings from radiocarbon dating also invalidate John Webb’s theory that Stonehenge was intended to be a Roman temple, as the Romans first came to the British Isles when Julius Caesar led an expedition in 55 BC, a good 1545 years after the construction of Stonehenge is found to have ended.

If the abovementioned explanations and speculations were not enough, there are several other explanations put forward by scholars and archaeologists over recent years. Although I cannot mention all the various theories and speculations in this essay, let us take a look at a couple of popular ones.

British archaeologist J.F.S. Stone speculated that a bluestone monument had earlier stood near the Stonehenge Cursus, a large Neolithic cursus monument on Salisbury Plain, near Stonehenge, which had been moved to the site of Stonehenge. This speculation gave rise to the theory that the bluestones were probably transplanted at the site as a mark of superiority over a conquered enemy or to cement some kind of an alliance between two cultures.

Some archaeologists speculated that the sedimentary sarsens and igneous bluestones symbolized the union between multiple different cultures from different backgrounds and landscapes. English archaeologist Mike Parker Pearson proposed that Stonehenge was a monument of unification that brought together different groups with different ancestries. He theorized that the five trilithons in the center of Stonehenge probably symbolized five tribal lineages charting their descent from five original ancestors who were originally from the Preseli Hills. This may have been the reason why the bluestones were brought all the way from Preseli Hills to the site of Stonehenge.

The trilithons may have also represented a D-shaped meeting house for the ancestors of the Stonehenge builders. Similar structures representing meeting houses have been found at other Neolithic sites in Britain as well.

Some scholars have even speculated that the trilithons represented doorways to another world.

In recent times, scholars Timothy Darvill and Geoffrey Wainwright have speculated that Stonehenge might have been an ancient pilgrimage and healing site since burials around the site show evidence of deformity and trauma. The magical qualities that the stones supposedly possessed probably attracted people to the monument, thereby making it a pilgrimage site for the sick and injured of the Neolithic world.

Theories regarding the structure’s intended purpose have been proposed as recently as 2015. Australian writer Lynne Kelly in her 2015 work Knowledge and Power in Prehistoric Societies: Orality, Memory, and the Transmission of Culture, speculates that Stonehenge might have served the purpose of a mnemonic center for recording and retrieving knowledge and information by Neolithic Britons, who did not have a written language.

Some scholars believe that the site had an astrological and spiritual importance associated with it.

There are several other theories proposed regarding this matter, none of which I shall get into now. I believe this was enough to give you an idea of the uncertainty, mystery, and speculation in which Stonehenge is shrouded.

Now let us look into another interesting and equally mysterious aspect of Stonehenge, which is the stones themselves.

Although there are several other stone circles and Neolithic henges dating back to the same age as Stonehenge, Stonehenge is still quite a unique structure, different from the others in a few aspects. Being over 7.3 meters (that is 24 feet) tall, its extant trilithons’ lintels are held in place with mortise and tenon joints, thereby making the structure unique from its contemporaries.

This uniqueness raises the question of how such huge stones were transported to the site, from where were they transported, and how were they arranged the way they were arranged.

Needless to say, the answers to these questions are also subject to speculation, although the primary source of the bluestones is generally and almost unanimously identified with the dolerite outcrops around Carn Goedog and Craig Rhos-y-Felin in the Preseli Hills in Wales.

However, a survey undertaken by Olwen Williams-Thorpe has also revealed that some other bluestones were identified with dolerite outcrops up to 10 kilometers away from the site.

Now, this begs the question, how did the builders of Stonehenge manage to transport these stones over such vast distances? Although we do not yet have an accurate and scientifically proven answer to this, multiple theories have been put forward to explain how the stones were transported.

Several geologists and archaeologists such as Aubrey Burl are of the view that the bluestones were not transported by human efforts but were instead brought at least part of the way from Wales by glaciers during the Pleistocene.

Upon finding glaciological and geological evidence that glacier ice moved across Preseli and reached the Somerset coast, it was speculated that glacier ice transported the stones from Preseli Hills to as far as Somerset, and then the stones were transported from there by the builders of Stonehenge. This was speculated because there is no evidence found to suggest that glacier ice reached Salisbury Plain, where Stonehenge is located.

In 2015, research confirmed that the stones at Stonehenge indeed came from two Neolithic quarries in the Preseli Hills, namely Carn Goedog and Craig Rhos-y-Felin. Radiocarbon dating has revealed that quarry activities existed in Craig Rhos-y-Felin around 3400 BC and in Carn Goedog around 3200 BC.

Since these stones were not installed at Stonehenge until around 2900 BC, it is speculated that it could have taken Neolithic stone draggers at least a good 500 years to transport the stones to the site of Stonehenge. However, scholars agree that this theory is highly unlikely.

But, for the sake of the argument, if it is assumed that the stones were indeed brought from the Preseli Hills in Wales to the site by human labor and not by glacier ice, the question remains how were they transported across such a vast distance?

Well, several methods have been suggested in answer to this question.

In an experiment conducted in 2001, an attempt was made to transport a large stone along a land and sea route from Wales to the site of Stonehenge. The stone was pulled for some miles with great difficulty by a group of people, using a wooden sled on land. The experiment was conducted on modern roads and with the assistance of low-friction netting to assist sliding. However, the experiment made it very clear that it would have been difficult for even the most organized of tribal groups to pull large numbers of such stones across the rough, boggy, and densely wooded terrain of West Wales.

In 2010, another method for transporting the stones was suggested after researchers found stone balls near Stonehenge-like monuments in Aberdeenshire, Scotland. These stone balls were more or less of the same size, that is the size of a cricket ball, thereby suggesting that they were meant to be used together for some purpose. This led to the idea of attempting to transport stones over short distances using ball bearings on a wooden track. This technique proved effective but not definitive.

Other methods were put forward as well, some effective and possible, but none indicating the accurate method that could possibly have been used.

One method proposes that such huge heavy stones could be moved by submerging them in water and then towing them below a vessel or a group of vessels. This technique would reduce the load borne by the vessel as part of the stone’s weight would be displaced by the water, and the arrangement of the load below the vessel would be much more stable, thereby reducing the risk of failure. However, when this technique was tried in an experiment with a single bluestone, it proved to be a failure.

Some methods proposed proved effective and workable, but not without the help of modern technology for safety and other reasons. While some other methods, though successful in application, raised several logistical questions that rendered the method doubtful.

For instance, an experiment was conducted to pull a 2-ton stone on wooden tracks with the help of around 16 men. The stone was placed on a wooden sled and the sled was placed on a wooden track, and then the 16 men pulled the stone with two groups of eight men. The experiment revealed that in order to transport the stones to the site of Stonehenge, the builders of Stonehenge would have had to build a lot of track, or move and rebuild the track in pieces, as the stones were taken to the site.

Overall, after countless surveys and research on the matter, it is speculated that the manpower required to construct Stonehenge could be estimated to have required around 20 million hours (that is approximately 2300 years) of work, with the help of the primitive tools used at the time.

This calculation leads to the assumption that the construction of Stonehenge and its maintenance were carried out by an advanced social organization and a strong will to construct such a site, indicating that it surely has some significance and symbolism that we have not discovered yet.

Although we may never uncover the mysteries of Stonehenge, it is perhaps these very mysteries that make Stonehenge such a beautiful, interesting, fascinating, and mythical monument. I personally wouldn’t mind the continuance of these myths and legends surrounding Stonehenge, for I believe that is what makes the monument unique and special.

Listen to the audio version of this article.

We have all come across the name Archimedes in our schooling years. I believe (and I may be wrong) that in all parts of the world, wherever science and mathematics are taught, the education system makes it a point to dedicate some space in their textbooks to Archimedes and his work, either in the field of mathematics, or physics in particular or science in general.

Where I grew up we certainly learned about Archimedes and his famous Eureka! Eureka! moment, and some of his other discoveries as well, almost all of which I do not remember today.

However, for the sake of this essay, I will try to look into those other discoveries once again, just so that I can lay them down here for your benefit. I will also try to give a brief account of his life, something that our textbooks never did.

Needless to say, being a man from ancient history, very little is actually known about Archimedes’ life, and out of what is known, very little can be considered wholly accurate. A lot of the details about his life have been arrived at through speculation and guesswork done by very reliable historians and scholars over the course of several centuries.

But obviously, this does not come as a surprise to you, so let us begin with who was Archimedes.

Archimedes was a Greek mathematician, physicist, astronomer, inventor, and engineer, born sometime around 287 BC in the ancient and historic city of Syracuse on the Italian island of Sicily. The city of Syracuse is known for its rich Greek and Roman history, culture, and architecture.

However, the most well-known element of Syracuse is Archimedes himself, so much so that Archimedes is often referred to as Archimedes of Syracuse, and Syracuse has come to be known as the birthplace of Archimedes.

Archimedes went on to accomplish several great things in his various fields of interest, leading him to be regarded as one of the greatest and leading scientists of the classical antiquity period.

Although the exact date of birth of Archimedes is not known, the year of his birth is calculated based on a statement by the Byzantine-Greek historian and poet John Tzetzes that Archimedes lived for 75 years before his death in 212 BC. Therefore, unfortunately, all we have is an approximate idea of his birth year on the basis of an account we cannot confirm or prove.

Archimedes’ father, Phidias, was also an astronomer according to Archimedes’ work Sand-Reckoner. However, nothing else is known of him.

Unfortunately, we do not have much information about Archimedes’ childhood and youth, and very little is known to us about his adult life.

The earliest known reference made to Archimedes is found in The Histories, written by the Greek historian Polybius about 70 years after the death of Archimedes. Polybius’ work does not say much about Archimedes as a person but instead focuses on the war machines that Archimedes was said to have built to defend the city from the Romans during the siege of Syracuse.

Polybius mentions many machines designed by Archimedes such as improved versions of stone-throwers, improved catapults, and multiple crane-like machines that could be swung around in an arc. Although the Romans succeeded in capturing Syracuse, they suffered more losses than they expected mainly due to the inventions of Archimedes.

Archimedes is also mentioned in some of the works of Roman statesman Cicero, who claimed to have visited Archimedes’ tomb in Syracuse while serving as a public official in Sicily more than a hundred years after Archimedes’ death. Cicero even claimed to have gotten his unkempt tomb cleaned, enabling him to see some carvings and verses inscribed on it, including a sculpture illustrating Archimedes’ favorite mathematical proof, that the volume and surface area of the sphere is two-thirds that of the cylinder including its bases.

In one of his works, Cicero also mentions that Roman general Marcus Claudius Marcellus brought back to Rome two planetariums built by Archimedes.

The next significant mention of Archimedes comes from the Greek historian Plutarch in his famous work Parallel Lives. In the work, Plutarch claims that Archimedes was related to the King of Syracuse, Hiero II. Hiero II features in the famous story that ends with Archimedes running naked through Syracuse shouting Eureka! Eureka!

But more on that later.

Plutarch also mentions two accounts of how Archimedes dies as Syracuse is captured by the Romans. In one account, as the city was being captured, Archimedes was contemplating a mathematical diagram when a Roman soldier confronted and ordered him to come and meet General Marcellus. Archimedes refused to go on the pretext that he had to finish working on the problem, thereby angering the soldier who then proceeded to kill Archimedes with his sword.

According to the second account, Archimedes was carrying some mathematical instruments when he was killed by a soldier who thought the instruments were valuable items.

Archimedes’ last words were said to be Do not disturb my circles! in reference to the mathematical diagram he was working on when confronted by the Roman soldier.

It is said that General Marcellus had given instructions not to harm Archimedes as he considered Archimedes a valuable scientific asset, referring to him as a geometrical Briareus. Hence, when Marcellus discovered that Archimedes had been killed, he became very angry.

No doubt, there is probably some myth and fiction involved in both these accounts of his death. The truth is that we will never know how he died or what his last words were. Therefore, not wasting more time speculating on this matter, let us now move on to his scientific and mathematical achievements.

Obviously, we must begin with the most famous one that has come to be known as Archimedes’ Principle. According to an account by the Roman architect and engineer Vitruvius, King Hiero suspected a goldsmith (to whom he had supplied gold to make a votive crown for a temple) of cheating him. To confirm his suspicions, he asked Archimedes to find out, without damaging the crown, if the goldsmith had used all the gold he had provided or not.

As Archimedes had to solve the problem without damaging the crown, he could not melt it down into a regularly-shaped body to calculate its density. And that was when, so the legend goes, while bathing Archimedes noticed that the level of the water in the tub rose when he got in. It struck him that he could use this effect to determine the crown’s volume. By dividing the mass of the crown by the volume of water displaced, the density of the crown could be calculated, and this density would be lower than that of gold if cheaper and less dense metals had been added while making the crown.

As per Vitruvius’ account, this was how Archimedes invented a method for determining the volume of irregularly shaped objects. After conducting this experiment with the crown, he discovered that silver had indeed been added while making the crown. He was so ecstatic with his discovery that he rose from the tub and, forgetting to dress up, ran through the streets of Syracuse naked shouting Eureka! Eureka!

Now although this whole account sounds very fascinating and even amusing, the practicality of the method used by Archimedes in this story has been questioned due to the extreme accuracy that would be required while measuring the displacement of water. Also, this account and the method used in it are not found in any known works of Archimedes.

A more plausible method used by him would be the method he describes in his treatise On Floating Bodies. As per this principle, a body immersed in fluid experiences a buoyant force equal to the weight of the fluid it displaces.

By using this principle, Archimedes would have been able to compare the density of the crown to that of pure gold by balancing the crown on a scale with a pure gold reference sample of the same weight and then immersing the apparatus in water. The difference in density between the two samples would cause the scale to tip accordingly.

It is this principle that would come to be known as Archimedes’ Principle.

Galileo himself would go on to invent a hydrostatic balance in 1586 for weighing metals in air and water after being inspired by Archimedes’ work. Galileo thought it more probable that Archimedes used this particular method rather than the one described in Vitruvius’ story, as this method was not only accurate but was also based on demonstrations found by Archimedes himself.

It is said that a lot of inventions of Archimedes were for the sake of Syracuse, either to enhance its protection or improve it in some way or the other.

For instance, it is said that Archimedes may have used mirrors collectively as a parabolic reflector in order to burn ships attacking Syracuse. This method would come to be known as the Archimedes heat ray, wherein the device was used to focus sunlight onto approaching ships, resulting in them catching fire. This device was said to be used during the siege of Syracuse.

The basic principle of this device has been used in the modern era to design similar devices such as solar furnaces and heliostats.

However, modern researchers, who have attempted to recreate the effect using just the means that would have been available to Archimedes, have only met with unsatisfactory and negative results, thereby casting some doubts on the credibility of Archimedes’ invention. They found that at most this device would serve to blind or distract the crew of the enemy ships, but not burn it.

Another device he was said to have designed to defend Syracuse was Archimedes’ Claw, also known as the ship shaker, which was used to defend the sea-facing part of the city’s wall from any attack from enemy ships. This device consisted of a crane-like arm from which a large metal grappling hook was suspended. When the claw was dropped onto an attacking ship, the arm would swing upwards and lift the ship out of the water and possibly sink it.

Interestingly, this device has been proven by modern researchers to work.

Archimedes is also credited with having designed block-and-tackle pulley systems that allowed sailors to use the principle of leverage to lift objects that would have been too heavy to lift. This is not to say that he invented the lever, but that he designed an improved version of the lever and gave mathematical proof of the principle in his treatise On the Equilibrium of Planes.

Greek mathematician Pappus of Alexandria claimed that Archimedes’ work and knowledge of levers led him to remark, Give me a place to stand on and I will move the Earth.

Archimedes was also credited with inventing the odometer, also known as the odograph, during the First Punic War fought between Carthage and Rome. The instrument was used to measure distances traveled by a vehicle. The one designed by Archimedes was described as a cart with a gear mechanism that dropped a ball into a container after every mile traveled.

He also designed what is now known as the Archimedes Screw, which is one of the earliest hydraulic machines. After being asked by King Hiero II to design the giant ship, Syracusia, which is said to have been the largest ship built in classical antiquity. Serving as a multipurpose ship, it could be used for carrying supplies, luxury travel, and as a naval warship as well.

And since such a large ship would leak a considerable amount of water through the hull, Archimedes designed the screw to remove the bilge water. It was basically a device with a revolving screw-shaped blade inside a cylinder that was turned by hand. It could also be used for transferring water from a low-lying body of water into irrigation canals. The Archimedes Screw is still used to this very day.

Archimedes has also gained a considerable reputation as an astronomer after having discussed the astronomical measurement of the sun, earth, and moon, as well as ancient Greek astronomer Aristarchus’ heliocentric model of the universe (which was the first-known model that placed the sun at the center of the known universe with the earth revolving around it once a year and rotating about its axis once a day), in his treatise Sand-Reckoner.

He made these observations without the use of a table of chords or trigonometry, instead using a straight rod with pegs or grooves. Then he applied correction factors to these measurements and arrived at the result in the form of lower and upper bounds to account for observational error.

These observations lead us to believe that Archimedes was the first-known Greek to have recorded multiple solstice dates and times in successive years.

Archimedes also went on to make a great contribution to the field of mathematics, so great that he is often regarded as the greatest mathematician of ancient history and one of the greatest of all times.

He derived an approximation of pi, designed a system using exponentiation for expressing large numbers, and defined and investigated the Archimedean spiral. He was one of the first ones to apply mathematics to physical phenomena, finding statics and hydrostatics. Doing this, he came up with proof of the principle of the lever, enunciated the law of buoyancy, and made widespread use of the concept of gravity.

More importantly, Archimedes is credited with having anticipated modern analysis and calculus by applying the concept of the infinitely small and the method of exhaustion to derive and prove a range of geometrical theorems such as the area of a parabola, the area of an ellipse, the area of a parabola, the area of a spiral, the volume of a segment of a paraboloid of revolution, the surface area and volume of a sphere, and the volume of a segment of a hyperboloid of revolution.

Unfortunately, during his lifetime Archimedes did not receive as much recognition for his mathematical achievements as he did for his inventions for the protection of his city. In fact, his mathematical writings and treatises were barely known in antiquity.

It was only much later after his death that his mathematical writings began to be read and quoted in Alexandria, Egypt. It was only sometime around 530 AD that the first comprehensive compilation of his mathematical writings was made by Byzatine-Greek architect Isidore of Miletus.

In the 6th century, Palestinian-Greek mathematician Eutocius of Ascalon wrote the first commentaries on many of Archimedes’ treatises, making them available to a wider readership.

Archimedes’ influence on subsequent generations has been massive and unparalleled. Many regard him as the father of mathematics and mathematical physics. Mathematical and scientific scholars almost unanimously consider him the greatest mathematician from antiquity, and one of the greatest and most influential ones of all time.

His works in all the fields he dabbled in went on to inspire and influence great scientists and mathematicians of subsequent generations such as Leonardo da Vinci, Galileo, Leibniz, Huygens, Newton, Gauss, Tesla, and several others.

His works also greatly influenced scientists during the Renaissance and again in the 17th century. Through his work and influence, his legacy shall continue to live on for centuries to come.

Listen to the audio version of this article.

Although I am not sure about the rest of the world, most Indians have certainly heard of the Portuguese explorer Vasco da Gama, who was the first European to arrive on the shores of India by sea.

Along with Prince Henry the Navigator of Portugal, Vasco da Gama was responsible for Portugal’s success as an early colonizing power. His voyages and exploits across Africa and Asia have made him one of the most celebrated and famous explorers from the Age of Discovery.

I too grew up hearing and learning about Vasco da Gama and his voyages to India. I grew up hearing about how he was the first explorer to link Europe and Asia by an ocean route, connecting the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. I also learned about how his discovery of the ocean route is regarded as a significant milestone in world history as it marked the beginning of a sea-based era of global multiculturalism.

Learning about all his voyages and exploits, I could not help but admire the man and find him inspiring. For me, he was an explorer who had undertaken arduous and adventurous voyages, risking his life while discovering new sea routes to Africa and Asia and exploring new places on these continents. How could a young boy not admire him?

Sadly, it was only years later when I was an adult that I learned about and understood the full extent of Vasco da Gama’s legacy, and it was only then that I realized that his legacy was not all positive but included an abundance of wrong, negative, and violent elements that I still struggle to wrap my head around at times.

I learned that Vasco da Gama was not just a celebrated and pioneering explorer but a cruel man whose extremely violent and hostage-taking methods set a definite pattern for Western colonialism during the age of discovery and colonization.

The crimes he committed against the natives of India and several other colonies in Asia and Africa disturbed me and made me question and even condemn his legacy. However, I also understand that the times were different back then and that the age of discovery and colonization was also the age of violence.

Other explorers of the time such as Christopher Columbus and Amerigo Vespucci did exactly the same. They too committed heinous crimes against the native population of the Americas, taking them as slaves or killing them or maiming and torturing them. In fact, the whole slave trade was a direct result of this dark age of discovery and colonization.

But when these disturbing facts are considered through the lens of historical context, one may understand why Vasco da Gama did what he did. Keeping this in mind, I check myself from condemning a man who lived and died almost five hundred years before I was born.

Interestingly enough, I knew all about the misdeeds of Columbus in the Americas and about the fact that his legacy is tainted with the blood of the native population but knew absolutely nothing about da Gama’s legacy which is tainted with the blood of my own people, and with that of the people of many other Portuguese colonies in Asia and Africa.

In this essay, we will take a look at the life of Vasco da Gama and the dark side of his legacy.

Vasco da Gama was said to be born in 1460 in the city of Sines on the Alentejo coast in southwest Portugal. However, some scholars speculate that he was born in the year 1469. Unfortunately, to this very day, no one knows for sure the exact date and month on which he was born, and as usual, we have no choice but to make do with the information we possess and leave the rest for speculation.

Vasco da Gama was the third of five sons of Estêvão da Gama and Isabel Sodré, and as far as we know so far, he had only one known sister named Teresa.

Unfortunately for us, little to nothing is known of da Gama’s early life. It is said that he studied in the inland town of Évora, where he probably studied mathematics and navigation. It is even speculated that he studied under the tutelage of Castilian astronomer and astrologer Abraham Zacuto. However, both of these claims cannot be confirmed yet with the limited information we have at hand.

Vasco da Gama’s father served as a knight of the household of Infante Ferdinand, Duke of Viseu and Beja, where he rose in the ranks of the military Order of Santiago. By 1480, Vasco da Gama followed his father’s footsteps and joined the Order of Santiago. The master of the order was Prince John, who in 1481 became King John II of Portugal. Prince John’s ascension to the throne became a great advantage to da Gama and his prospects brightened.

King John II undertook the task of renewing Portugal’s exploration of Africa and Asia and sought to re-establish the power of the Portuguese monarchy and reinvigorate its economy. In order to achieve these ends, he concentrated on royal commerce by expanding the slave and gold trade in West Africa and by looking for ways to enter the highly profitable spice trade between Asia and Europe, which was at the time mainly carried out by land and monopolized by the Republic of Venice.

King John II set a new mission for his captains by asking them to find a sea route to Asia by sailing around Africa. In 1487, he sent two of his explorers, Afonso de Paiva and Pero da Covilhã to scout the details of the spice markets and trade routes.

The following year, Portuguese explorer Bartolomeu Dias became the first European navigator to round the southern tip of Africa and verified that the unknown coast stretched away to the northeast. King John II then began sending out expeditions to form a link between the findings of Covilhã, Paiva, and Dias, and connect these separate segments into a lucrative trade route across the Indian Ocean.

In the year 1497, Vasco da Gama was chosen for his first voyage to Asia. Prior to this, in 1492, King John II had only sent him on a mission to the port of Setubal and to the Algarve to seize French ships in retaliation for peacetime depredations against Portuguese shipping, and da Gama had successfully carried out this mission.

Now, five years later, on 8th July 1497, Vasco da Gama set sail from Lisbon with a fleet of 4 ships and a crew of about 170 men. Da Gama led the expedition and commanded the main ship while his older brother Paulo da Gama commanded another ship.

The expedition followed the same route pioneered by previous explorers along the coast of Africa via Tenerife and the Cape Verde islands. Seeking and finding the South Atlantic westerlies that Dias had discovered in 1487, the expedition managed to make landfall on the African coast on 4th November.

Through this first leg of the voyage itself, the expedition managed to make history by sailing more than 6,000 miles (10,000 kilometers) of open ocean, which was by far the longest voyage out of sight of land made at the time.

Passing the Great Fish River in Eastern Cape, South Africa, on 16th December, Vasco da Gama and his men named the coast they were passing Natal, which carried the connotation of the birth of Christ in Portuguese.

Arriving in Mozambique in early March 1498, Vasco da Gama sought an audience with the Sultan. However, since the majority of the population was Muslim, he feared they would be hostile toward Christians. To prevent this from happening, it is said that he impersonated a Muslim and succeeded in getting an audience with the Sultan.

But da Gama had no gifts or goods worthy of the Sultan, and the royal authorities and locals grew suspicious of him and his crew, eventually turning hostile and forcing them to flee Mozambique. As the Portuguese departed, da Gama ordered cannons to be fired into the city in retaliation.

Before arriving in Mombasa, Kenya, in early April, the expedition looted Arab merchant ships which were unarmed. Upon arriving at the port of Mombasa on 7th April, they were met with hostility and were forced to depart on the 13th of April.

Continuing their journey north, they arrived at the port of Malindi in Kenya on 14th April, where they first saw evidence of Indian traders. It is said that in Malindi Vasco da Gama met and contracted the services of a pilot (most probably Indian) who had knowledge of the monsoon winds to guide them toward the city of Calicut on the southwest coast of India.

On 24 April, da Gama and his men set sail from Malindi for India.

Almost a month later, on 20th May 1498, Vasco da Gama and his fleet arrived at the coastal village of Kappad, near Calicut (present-day the Indian state of Kerala). When they arrived, the king of Calicut was away at his second capital Ponnani.

When the king heard of the arrival of da Gama and his crew, he immediately returned to Calicut and gave them an audience with him. When the Portuguese were asked the reason for their arrival on the shores of Calicut, they replied that they had come in search of Christians and spices. Da Gama presented the king with several trivial gifts that left the king unimpressed.

The Portuguese had no gold or silver to offer the king, which led the officials and the local population to suspect the motives of da Gama and his men. They began suspecting that the Portuguese were pirates and not royal ambassadors.

Before leaving the shores of Calicut, Vasco da Gama asked the king to allow him to leave behind a factor in charge of the merchandise he could not sell, but the king turned down his request and asked him to pay customs duty in gold just like every other trader.

Da Gama did not take this rejection well and his relationship with the king became strained. In retaliation, da Gama ordered the capture of 16 fishermen and a few Nairs (a group of Indian Hindu castes) and took them with him by force, and left Calicut for Portugal on 29th August 1498.

The return journey of the expedition was arduous and riddled with difficulties and disappointments. Vasco da Gama would arrive in Lisbon only a year later, either on 29th August or on 8th or 18th September 1499 (sources differ). The total distance covered in the outward and return voyages made da Gama’s first expedition to India the longest ocean voyage ever undertaken until then.

However, the expedition had incurred large costs as two out of four ships, along with half the men of the crew (including da Gama’s brother Paulo), had been lost. The expedition had also failed in its primary mission of securing a commercial treaty with the king of Calicut.

But, despite these failures and setbacks, Vasco da Gama was welcomed and honored as a hero, with processions and public festivities held in his honor. The description and details of his voyage quickly began spreading across Europe, thereby increasing his fame and reputation as an explorer and navigator.

Da Gama was celebrated for finding and establishing a direct sea route to Asia, and the small quantities of spices and other goods brought back by the two remaining ships showed potential for highly profitable trading in the future.

Vasco da Gama’s first voyage opened up and paved the way for subsequent yearly voyages of the Portuguese Indian Armadas, the fleet of ships funded by the Portuguese crown meant to sail to India. These yearly voyages helped the Portuguese crown enter the profitable spice trade that became a major asset to the royal treasury and also began an age of Portuguese colonization of parts of Africa and Asia, starting with the colonization of Mozambique and then going on to include several colonies in India.

Da Gama’s next expedition to India would take place about three years after his return from the first voyage and would be for the Fourth India Armada which sailed from Lisbon on 12th February 1502. The main purpose of this expedition was not exploration or trade but revenge.

The Second India Armada launched in 1500 under the command of Pedro Alvares Cabral was given the mission of entering into a treaty with the king of Calicut and setting up a Portuguese factory there. However, after getting into conflict with the local Arab merchant guilds, the Portuguese factory was attacked and damaged in a bloody violent riot that killed 70 Portuguese. Blaming the king of Calicut for the riot, Cabral, in retaliation, bombarded the city, and war broke out.

After getting news of the treatment meted out to Cabral, Vasco da Gama, taking offense, wrote a letter to the Portuguese crown asking permission to take command of the Fourth India Armada with the sole mission of taking revenge on the king of Calicut and force him to submit to Portuguese terms.

Keeping this mission in mind, the fleet of this expedition included 15 heavily armed ships and 800 men, followed by 5 more ships led by da Gama’s cousin Estêvão da Gama.

While on their way to India, the fleet got in contact with the East African gold trading port of Sofala and reduced the sultanate of Kilwa to tribute by extracting a large sum of gold.

As they were approaching Indian shores in October 1502, Vasco da Gama’s fleet intercepted a ship of Muslim pilgrims (who were traveling to Mecca from Calicut) at the town of Madayi and looted it, locked up the passengers (400 in total, including women and children), the owner, and an ambassador from Egypt, and burned them to death.

An eyewitness named Thomé Lopes described the incident in detail and even went on to mention how Vasco da Gama witnessed the massacre through the porthole and saw women bring up their gold and jewels and hold up their babies to beg for mercy. However, except for 20 children who were forcefully converted to Christianity, none were spared.

Vasco da Gama’s fleet would then go on toward Calicut and demand redress for the way Cabral was treated. The king of Calicut was now willing to sign a new treaty with Vasco da Gama after learning of the fate of the pilgrim’s ship.

But mere negotiations were not enough for da Gama. He had come there for revenge, and so he asked the king, who was a Hindu, to expel all Muslims from the city before starting negotiations. Needless to say, the king rejected his request and simultaneously sent a message to the Raja of Cochin to assist him in repelling the Portuguese threat.

The Raja of Cochin, who was a rebellious vassal of the king, forwarded the king’s message to da Gama, leaving da Gama furious. The king then sought the help of the high priest Talappana Namboothiri (who had first brought da Gama in contact with the king during the first visit) and sent him for talks with da Gama.

What would happen next is by all measures deeply cruel and disturbing. Vasco da Gama, considering the priest to be a spy, ordered his ears and lips to be cut off and a pair of dog’s ears sewed to his head, and then sent him away.

Then da Gama ordered the bombardment of the city from the sea for almost two days, causing severe damage to it. He also ordered the capture of rice vessels and cut off the hands, noses, and ears of the crew, and then sent them with a note to the king, stating that he would be open to relations once the king paid for the items plundered from the Portuguese factory and also for the cannonballs and gunpowder.

This incident brought a sudden halt to trade along the Malabar coast, and, in retaliation, the king despatched a fleet of warships to defeat da Gama’s armada, leading to the Battle of Calicut in which da Gama’s fleet prevailed.

Before leaving Indian shores in early 1503, Vasco da Gama made sure to leave behind a squadron of caravels under the command of his uncle, Vicente Sodré, to harass Calicut shipping, patrol the Indian coast, and protect the Portuguese factories established in Cochin and Cannanore.

In September 1503, Vasco da Gama and his fleet arrived back in Portugal. Despite all the violence and havoc that da Gama had unleashed in India, he failed in his primary mission of getting the king of Calicut to submit to Portuguese terms. The following years would also reveal his uncle’s failure to protect the Portuguese factories on the Malabar coast.

Upon returning to Portugal, Vasco da Gama did not receive the welcome he had received after his first voyage four years ago. There was no hero’s welcome for him and no rewards from the king. No public festivities or processions were held in his honor. When King Manuel I of Portugal decided to appoint the first governor and viceroy of Portuguese India in 1505, he overlooked Vasco da Gama and chose nobleman and explorer Dom Francisco de Almeida.

Vasco da Gama had fallen out of service with the Portuguese crown and was sidelined from politics and Indian affairs almost entirely. No longer welcomed or celebrated at the royal court, he spent the next 20 years living a quiet life away from the affairs of the court.

In 1519, after several years of ignoring da Gama’s letters and petitions, and after da Gama threatened to defect to the Crown of Castile following fellow explorer Ferdinand Magellan’s example, King Manuel I agreed to give him a feudal title by appointing him the first Count of Vidigueira, a count title created by a royal decree. The decree granted Vasco da Gama and his heirs all the revenues and privileges related, thereby making da Gama the first Portuguese count not born with royal blood.

In 1521, King Manuel I died and was succeeded by his son King John III of Portugal. This change saw da Gama’s fortune turn for the good. Coming out of his hiatus from affairs of the royal court, Vasco da Gama became an important adviser to the new king’s overseas strategy and appointments. And after colonial officer Duarte de Menezes, then the governor of Portuguese India, was found to be corrupt and incompetent, the king appointed da Gama to replace him as Governor of India.

The king was confident that the legacy, memory, and name of Vasco da Gama would serve to better impress his authority in Portuguese India. In February 1524, da Gama was given the title of Viceroy, and he immediately used his new position to secure appointments for his sons in various capacities of the Portuguese government overseas.

In April 1524, Vasco da Gama set out with a fleet of 14 ships on his last voyage to India along with two of his sons.

The journey to India was arduous and they ended up losing 4 or 5 of the ships en route. After arriving on Indian shores in September of that year, da Gama set about with the transition to a new government and new order in Portuguese India. He replaced all old officials with new ones and undertook several other strategic changes.

However, his reign in Portuguese India was not destined to last long. Three months after his arrival, he contracted malaria and died in the city of Cochin on 24th December 1524, somewhere between the ages of 55 and 65 (since we do not know the exact year of his birth, his age at the time of his death is difficult and even impossible to calculate).

His body was first buried at St. Francis Church in Fort Cochin before his remains were returned to Portugal in 1539. In Portugal, it was interred in Vidigeueira in a casket decorated with jewels and gold.

In 1880, his remains were again moved to the necropolis of the Portuguese royal dynasty of Aviz and placed in newly carved tombs in the monastery’s church, barely a few meters away from the tombs of King Manuel I and King John III, the latter of whom he had served under.

Although Vasco da Gama’s legacy and reputation have slightly suffered over the years due to his cruel acts against native populations and at times outright piracy in colonies in Africa and Asia, his legacy is still strong and continues to live on.

His voyages and exploits are taught and studied by the colonizing powers as well as by the colonized nations, although the full extent of his cruelty is rarely revealed and taught in contemporary education, not even in the former colonies.

Statutes and monuments have been erected in his honor in Portugal and the former colonies as well, the latter mostly by him during his own lifetime. Pillars indicating that Vasco da Gama had visited a certain place can be found in Malindi (in Kenya), Cape of Good Hope (in South Africa), Kappad (near Calicut, India), and several other places.

Vasco da Gama has remained a national hero and icon of Portugal, with poems written in his honor (such as the Portuguese national epic poem The Lusiads by Luís Vaz de Camões), and churches, towers, bridges, ports, and other public places named after him.

Not only has da Gama been honored in various ways in Portugal but also in several former Portuguese colonies across the world. In Brazil, three football teams have been named after him. Churches and ports have also been named in his honor in the former colonies, for instance, the Vasco da Gama Church (also known as St. Francis Church, where da Gama was first buried) in Cochin and the port city of Vasco da Gama in Goa.

For all his tainted legacy, one cannot deny or ignore the fact that Vasco da Gama has earned the right to be regarded as one of the greatest and most celebrated explorers of the Age of Discovery. His achievements as an explorer, navigator, adventurer, and pioneer are admirable, although the collateral damages of his achievements are at times too much to bear.

Books on Amazon

Many have probably heard about the Code of Hammurabi in either their history or law classes, although very few might remember anything relating to it, its date or contents, laws or its purpose, or anything else regarding it.

Most people just know that the Code of Hammurabi was laid down by a certain king named Hammurabi. And that is a good enough start, to be honest.

In this essay, we will take a brief look at what the Code of Hammurabi is, what are its contents, what is its purpose, and why is it significant.

For the unversed, the Code of Hammurabi is a Babylonian legal text that was composed sometime between 1755 BC to 1750 BC by King Hammurabi (or under his supervision at least), the sixth Amorite king of the Old Babylonian Empire (also known as the First Dynasty of Babylon), reigning from 1792 BC to 1750 BC. The contents of the text suggest that it was probably composed sometime toward the end of his reign.

The code is written in the Old Babylonian dialect of Akkadian and is the longest, most preserved, and most organized legal text existing from the ancient Near East.

Many historians and scholars consider it one of the earliest legal texts dealing with human rights, as mentioned in my essay On the History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Middle Ages. Several modern and contemporary scholars admire the code for its respect for the rule of law and its apparent fairness at least in theory. They also marvel at its broad scope which includes commercial law, property law, criminal law, and family law.

Now, how, where, and when did we find this code in the first place? you might wonder.

Well, the first copy of the text was found inscribed on a basalt stele 7 feet 4 and a half inches tall at the site of the ancient Elamite city of Susa, then Persia (modern-day Iran). The stele was found in three large fragments by the French Archaeological Mission led by French archaeologist Jean-Jacques de Morgan. The large fragments were found on the tell of the Susa acropolis between December 1901 and January 1902 and were easy to assemble and reconstruct.

The stele is 7 feet 4 and a half inches high with a circumference of 5 feet 5 inches at the summit and 6 feet 3 inches at the base. The top of the structure has the image of Hammurabi with the Babylonian god of the sun and justice, Shamash, in which Hammurabi is shown standing before a seated Shamash, who is wearing the horned crown of divinity and has flames spouting from his shoulders.

Needless to say, just as in every aspect of ancient history, scholars have come up with contrasting interpretations of the image, some proposing that Hammurabi is the one who is seated holding a scribe’s stylus, while Shamash is standing and dictating the code to Hammurabi.

Unfortunately, since we can't determine the true interpretation now, it would be wise not to get into this particular rabbit hole. So I will let it go as we have other things to discuss.

Below the image of Hammurabi and Shamash are about 4,130 lines of cuneiform text, a logo-syllabic script that was used to write several languages of the ancient Middle East. One-fifth of the text contains the prologue and the epilogue, while the remaining four-fifths contain the laws. The bottom of the stele is also said to have had seven columns of the laws with more than 80 lines each, which were polished and erased in antiquity.

As the stele is now displayed in the Louvre, it is commonly referred to as the Louvre stele. Several copies of the code were created during Hammurabi’s rule and even after it. The text became a part of the scribal curriculum and more than fifty copies of it were found in various regions even outside of Susa, such as Assur, Nippur, Nineveh, Borsippa, Larsa, Sippar, Ur, and Babylon, indicating that the laws were widely known and circulated during and after Hammurabi’s reign.

Copies of the text have been found dating around 1,000 years after the original stele was created. These additional copies helped fill in and complete the original text, including some of the erased sections below.

Now that we have some context as to what the code is and the structure on which it was inscribed, let us discuss its content.

As mentioned above, below the image of Hammurabi and Shamash are 4,130 lines of cuneiform text, starting with the prologue. The prologue occupies 300 lines and is written in a poetic style, beginning with an etiology of Hammurabi’s royal authority to lay down the code. The etiology goes something like this:

Anum, the Babylonian sky god and king of the gods, granted rulership over humanity to Marduk, who chose the center of his earthly rule to be Babylon and became the city’s patron deity. And then Anum, along with Enlil, the Babylonian wind god, chose Hammurabi to be the king of Babylon in order to prevent the strong from oppressing the weak.

In the prologue, Hammurabi claims that he was to rise like Shamash over the Mesopotamians and illuminate the land. Then follows a list of his accomplishments and virtues laid down in first person singular nominal sentences, starting with I am Hammurabi, the Shepherd, selected by the god Enlil. The metaphor of him being the shepherd of his people occurs often and so does his calling himself pious.

The list includes his affinities with the various gods and goddesses and shows him as being peerless on the battlefield and dutiful for restoring and maintaining temples.

After the end of the list, Hammurabi claims that he was successful in fulfilling the request of Marduk to establish truth and justice for the people, thereby bringing an end to the prologue.

After the prologue ends, the laws are laid down in the following 3,330 lines. These laws cover the following legal areas:

1. Offenses against the administration of law – dealing with false charges, false testimony, and falsification of judgment.

2. Property offenses – dealing with stealing and receiving stolen property, kidnapping, harboring fugitive slaves, breaking and entering, burglary, and looting burning houses.

3. Land and houses – dealing with tenure of fiefs, duties of farmers, debts of farmers, irrigation offenses, cattle trespass, cutting down trees, care of date orchards, and offenses connected with houses.

4. Commerce – dealing with loans and trade, innkeeping, fraud by couriers, distraint and pledge of persons for debt, and safe custody or deposit.

5. Marriage, family, and property – dealing with slander of ugbabtum-priestesses or married women, the definition of “married woman”, adultery, remarriage in husbands’ absence, divorce, marriage to nadītum-women, maintenance of sick wives, gifts from husbands to wives, the liability of spouses for debt, murder of husbands, incest, inchoate marriage, devolution of marriage-gifts after wives’ deaths, gifts to sons inter vivos, succession amongst sons, disinheritance of sons, legitimation, widows’ property, the marriage of awīlum-class women to slaves, remarriage of widows, sacral women, adoption, and nursing of infants.

6. Assault – dealing with assaults on fathers, assaults on awīlum-class men, and assaults causing miscarriage.

7. Professional men – dealing with surgeons, veterinary surgeons, barbers, builders, shipbuilders, and boatmen.

8. Agriculture – dealing with oxen, theft of fodder by tenants, hire of agricultural laborers, theft of agricultural implements, hire of herdsmen, duties of shepherds, hire of beasts and wagons, and hiring of seasonal laborers.

9. Rates of hire – dealing with wages of craftsmen and hire of boats.

10. Slaves – dealing with warranties on the sale of slaves and the purchase of slaves abroad.

These laws are all casuistic, written in the form of conditional sentences such as “if……then”.

Ideally, I would love to list certain examples of the laws laid down for each of these legal areas, but I think it would be a bit too much. If one wishes to see examples, one can easily find them on the internet. So I guess I will skip that part.

Now let us move on to the epilogue.

The epilogue toward the end (also written in a poetic style) is 500 lines long and relates to the laws laid down above. Hammurabi declares that the above laws are just decisions established by him and proceeds to exalt his own magnanimity and praise the laws. He states that any wronged man who has a lawsuit against him may have the laws read aloud to him and that this would bring him praise and divine favor. He then wishes good fortune on any ruler who heeds and respects the laws and invokes the wrath of the god on any man who disobeys or erases his laws.

The epilogue keeps reusing the phrase to prevent the strong from oppressing the weak, but rather than seeming as if Hammurabi was concerned about his subjects, the epilogue gives one the impression that he was more concerned with ensuring that his achievements and legacy are not forgotten and his name not sullied.

Hammurabi then goes on to dedicate the next 281 lines to heaping curses upon any future defacer of his laws, some of which can be considered harsh and extremely vivid, such as May he [the future defacer] conclude every day, month, and year of his reign with groaning and mourning, or may he experience the spilling of his life force like water, or may the god Sin… decree for him a life that is no better than death.

Hammurabi also requests the various gods to turn their particular individual attributes against the defacer. In total, he goes on to invoke 14 gods and goddesses.

Now, this brings an end to the contents of the code as found in the stele. However, despite everything we now know and understand about the Code of Hammurabi, there is still a lot of uncertainty and speculation surrounding its intended purpose. Debates and disputes between scholars regarding the purpose and legal authority of the code have been going on since the mid-20th century with no common consensus found yet.

In all likelihood, there will never be a theory that is unanimously agreed upon by various scholars. There will always be a contradictory theory, a different and unconventional interpretation of the code. But that is understood and expected and simply part of the game when one wishes to talk about ancient history.

Theories of the code’s intended purpose roughly fall into three categories:

1. Legislation

2. Law Report

3. Jurisprudence

The first theory supposes that the code was intended to be enforced as legislation, that is, as a code of law or a body of statutes. This is because the text resembles a highly organized code of law similar to the Code of Justinian (which is one part of the Corpus Juris Civilis, the codification of Roman law ordered in the early 6th century AD by the Eastern Roman Emperor in Constantinople Justinian I) and the Napoleonic Code (the French Civil Code established during the French Consulate in 1804 and signed by Napoleon Bonaparte). A discovered copy of the code also refers to it as ṣimdat šarrim, meaning royal decree, which implies a kind of enforced legislation.

The second theory supposes that the code is somewhat of a law report containing records of past cases and judgments phrased and written abstractly. Some scholars believe that this theory might explain the casuistic format of the laws. This theory gained some credit when a record of a case similar to one of the laws was found by French historian Jean Bottero. However, finding such cases is quite rare, thereby making the theory inconclusive. Also, legal cases and judgments were usually well-recorded in Mesopotamia with the facts of the case recorded in detail. Hence, this theory has failed to gain much traction.

The third theory is that the code is an abstract treatise on how judgments should be formulated, but not a true legal code. This led some scholars to regard the code as jurisprudence rather than legislation. Some propose that it is a work of Mesopotamian scholarship as it bears a striking similarity with other works of Mesopotamian scholarship in the way it is written.

Some scholars even propose that the Code of Hammurabi, like other Mesopotamian law collections, represents an interesting formulation of social criticism and must therefore not be regarded as normative directions. Also, the fact that the code became such an intrinsic part of the late Babylonian curriculum as a scholarly and literary text (something no other law collection had become) made scholars suspect that it was intended to be a scholarly treatise rather than a code of laws.

Today, it is quite difficult to pinpoint with utmost accuracy and certainty which theory is correct and true. Chances are that the real purpose for which the code was intended will never be known to us. Therefore, one is free to speculate and argue and debate and dispute over which of these theories is right or wrong.

Despite such uncertainty, one cannot ignore the influence of the Code of Hammurabi on subsequent centuries. By no means was it the first law collection laid down in ancient Mesopotamia (The Code of Ur-Nammu of Ur, Code of Lipit-Ishtar of Isin, and The Laws of Eshnunna were composed before the Code of Hammurabi), but it is one of the most popular and influential ones.

Although the underlying principle of the Code of Hammurabi, which is, the principle of lex talionis (meaning eye for an eye), may be far from the spirit of modern legal systems of civil and common law, other principles such as the presumption of innocence, the importance of written evidence (especially in contract matters), one crime one punishment, the importance of the intentions of a defendant, and the right of a wronged man to have the laws read aloud to him, have no doubt influenced our modern legal systems to a great extent.

The Code of Hammurabi was lauded and praised by modern and contemporary scholars for having humanitarian laws protecting and providing justice to the weak and helpless, the poor, the widow, and the orphan. Scholars have referred to it as one of the most important monuments in the history of the human race, have called it a moral and political masterpiece, and have praised it for its modernity of spirit. However, if one reads the code today, the laws may seem harsh, brutal, and even somewhat unfair due to the violent corporal punishments advocated for some laws.

Although the influence of the Code of Hammurabi on later law collections is difficult to determine, its influence is also presumed to be found in the Mosaic Law, also called the Law of Moses.

One thing is for sure, despite all the speculation and uncertainty surrounding the Code of Hammurabi, we must consider ourselves fortunate to have discovered it in its original form, for it is no doubt a significant discovery of our rich yet complicated history.

Books on Amazon

Let me just say this outright – Spartacus was an absolute legend. Few men in history can be considered as brave and courageous as Spartacus was.

Most of us have heard of him thanks to a few popular television series and movies and whatnot. At least that was how I discovered the name of Spartacus, through a television series that aired on Starz. The series dealt with the life of Spartacus as a slave gladiator who eventually inspires and leads a slave uprising.

The series, no doubt, was amazing, and not just me but most of my friends discovered Spartacus through the same series.

For those of you who have not seen any series, movies, or documentaries on the man, and have maybe never even heard of him until now, allow me to introduce him.

So who was Spartacus, this slave who became a legend?

Well, Spartacus was an enslaved Thracian gladiator who, along with other enslaved gladiators, inspired and led a major slave revolt against the mighty Roman Republic.

Now, first of all, you may wonder what does Thracian mean? You see, Thracians were people who lived primarily in the Balkans and in Asia Minor, and other regions of Eastern and Southeastern Europe, in ancient history.

Before I go into the life of Spartacus, I want you to understand that historical accounts of his life are not all accurate and are often contradictory. In fact, very little is known about him beyond the slave uprising he led.

Plutarch described Spartacus as a Thracian of Nomadic stock, which is assumed to be a reference to the Thracian tribe of Maedi that occupied the region between Thrace and Paionia. The Greek historian Appian of Alexandria claimed that Spartacus was a Thracian by birth, who had once served as a soldier in the Roman army.

A writer/historian named Florus described him as a Thracian mercenary who had become a Roman soldier and then had deserted and become enslaved and later made a gladiator.

From these accounts and several others, two things are generally agreed upon. One, Spartacus was a Thracian. And two, he was once a Roman soldier, maybe even an accomplished military leader, who somehow fell out of favor, was enslaved, and sold for a gladiator.

Plutarch also states that Spartacus’ wife, who was a prophetess of the Maedi tribe, was also enslaved with him. However, the accuracy of this claim could not be verified by learned historians, least of all by me.

The true account of how a Roman soldier ended up enslaved may most probably never be known to us. Unfortunately, it is a part of history that will forever be lost in history itself. Little is known of his time before he became a gladiator and a slave rebel leader, and all one can do to put the pieces together is merely speculate on the matter. And just like everyone else before me, speculate I shall!

So what happened to Spartacus once he was a captive taken by the legions?

Well, it is said that he was trained to become a gladiator in a gladiator school in Capua in Southern Italy that belonged to a Roman man named Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Vatia, also known as Lentulus Batiatus. At the school, he trained as a heavyweight gladiator. Heavyweight gladiators were known as murmillos, and they used a sword with a broad, straight blade about 18 inches long, and a large oblong shield.

Now, how was Spartacus as a gladiator? One might wonder, including myself. My answer is simple, I do not know. I assume he was good, maybe even great, but that is merely an assumption based on the limited knowledge I possess through the series I watched. A dramatized version of his life can hardly be regarded as wholly accurate, and so here I humbly proclaim my ignorance.

Another reason that leads me to believe that he was a great gladiator is the fact that he inspired and led around 70 other rough and tough gladiators in their eventual escape from the gladiator school. Surely he must have been great at what he did in order to command such respect from other hardened gladiators.

But, again, this is just a theory with no facts to back it up, much like most things relating to Spartacus’ life. Even historical accounts cannot help us much to recreate his life as an enslaved gladiator. Therefore, allow me to skip straight to the most dramatic and interesting part of his life, which is the actual revolt.

Sometime around 73 BC, Spartacus and a group of about 70 gladiators began plotting their escape from the school and thereby from slavery. Though the number they stood at could be considered insignificant to actually pose any serious threat to the Republic, the slaves managed to fight their way out of the school with the help of kitchen utensils such as choppers, knives, spits, etc, and by seizing several wagons with gladiatorial armors and weapons in them.

Upon their escape, the slaves managed to defeat the small number of soldiers that were sent after them and they plundered the region surrounding Capua. They eventually took up a defensive position on Mount Vesuvius. This would be the beginning of the rebellion that would come to be known as the Third Servile War, which, according to Voltaire, was the only just war in history.

Although their position on Mount Vesuvius was more of a spontaneous gathering of the escaped slaves rather than a well-organized military unit, a few among them, such as the Gallic gladiators Crixus, Castus, and Oenomaus, the Celtic gladiator Gannicus, and Spartacus himself, would come to assume leadership positions and serve as the military leaders of the rebel army in the oncoming war.

So why has the war come to be known as the Third Servile War? you may wonder. Well, it turns out that the war that would be waged by Spartacus and his men was not the first one attempted by slaves in the late Roman Republic. Two other slave revolts had taken place in the past, the first from 135 to 132 BC, and the second from 104 to 100 BC. Hence, Spartacus was responsible for starting, perhaps unknowingly, the third and most dangerous one yet.

The slave army easily defeated the small Roman force sent to recapture them and then equipped themselves with the captured military equipment, making them even more dangerous and strong.

As the initial revolt and raids occurred in and around Campania, a vacation spot for the rich and influential in Rome, the revolt quickly attracted the attention of Roman authorities, who first thought it to be a major crime wave rather than a serious armed rebellion or war.

The authorities, dismissing the rebellion as a mere policing matter, sent a militia of 3,000 men under the command of praetor Gaius Claudius Glaber. The militia besieged the slaves on Mount Vesuvius by blocking the only known way down the mountain.

Glaber decided to wait until starvation would force Spartacus and his men to surrender. But Spartacus turned out to be an incredible tactician, which lends some credibility to the fact that he previously had some military experience.

In response to the siege, the rebels made ropes and ladders from vines and trees growing on the slopes of Vesuvius and then used them to rappel down the steep side of the mountain opposite the Roman militia. Then they moved around the base of Vesuvius, outflanked the militia, and killed most of them.

This was their first major victory against the Roman army. Their second victory came after they defeated the second expedition sent after them, led by praetor Publius Varinius. Varinius split his militia into two under the command of two of his lieutenants. But the rebels managed to defeat the militia, nearly capturing Varinius, killing his lieutenants, and seizing the military equipment of the soldiers.

Unfortunately, around the time of these two successful battles, the rebels lost one of their main leaders, Oenomaus, most probably in battle.

These two decisive victories inspired more slaves, shepherds, and herdsmen in the region to join the slave army and take part in the rebellion, swelling their ranks to around 70,000.

The slaves continued with their raids, expanding their raiding territories to include the towns Nuceria, Metapontum, Thurii, and Nola. Keeping in mind the distance between these towns, it is speculated that the slaves probably operated in two groups commanded by Spartacus and Crixus.

During the winter months, the rebels trained, armed, and equipped their new recruits, and continued with their raids.

The Roman authorities now began to take the slave army seriously after they had proved their ability to withstand the Roman armies sent after them. Now, it was a war, not just a crime wave.

In the spring of 72 BC, the slave army left their winter encampments and made their way northwards. The Roman authorities, having learned their lesson the hard way, dispatched two legions after the rebels. At first, they proved successful after defeating a group of 30,000 rebels led by Crixus near Mount Garganus. However, the legions were soon defeated by the rebels led by Spartacus.

But the slave army suffered a great loss this time. Two-thirds of the rebels led by Crixus were killed, including Crixus himself.

Once again surprised by the slave army’s victory, the Roman Senate appointed General and Statesman Marcus Licinius Crassus, who was known as the richest man in Rome, to bring an end to the rebellion. Crassus was put in command of eight legions consisting of over 40,000 trained soldiers.

For reasons unknown to this day, Spartacus, who was leading his men northward, decided to retreat to the south of Italy and began moving northward again in early 71 BC. The rebels were now on the defensive, and their situation would soon take a turn for the worse.

Crassus deployed six legions on the borders of the region and sent his legate with two legions to maneuver the rebels. In the engagements that would follow between the legions and the rebels, the legions were victorious in most of them, forcing Spartacus and his men to retreat further south. Crassus now had the advantage over the rebels and the rebels were in trouble.

By the end of 71 BC, Spartacus and his men were encamped in Rhegium, near the Strait of Messina. Crassus ordered his legions to build fortifications across the isthmus at Rhegium. The rebels were now under siege, cut off from their supplies, and with no route, land or water, to escape.

It is said that the rebels made some attempts at building ships and rafts to escape by sea, but Crassus took measures that made it impossible for them to continue with the plan. The rebels now had their backs against the wall, their numbers and morale decreasing every passing day.

Around this time, the legions of General and Statesman Pompey returned from Hispania and were asked by the Senate to help Crassus against Spartacus and his men. But Crassus was not happy with this new development which threatened to steal credit from him for ending the slave rebellion by himself.

Seeing this as an opportunity, Spartacus attempted a truce with Crassus but Crassus refused. In response, Spartacus and his men broke through the fortifications and made their way to Brundusium, with Crassus’ legions chasing them.

The legions managed to catch up to a portion of the rebels and separated them from the main army. This not only drastically reduced their numbers but also resulted in them losing discipline and morale. Small groups of rebels attacked the legions independently in a haphazard and disorganized manner, leaving them weak and vulnerable.

It was most probably at this point that Spartacus realized the rebels were doomed, signaling the end of the rebellion. Perhaps it was this realization that compelled him to turn his forces around and bring their entire strength to face the legions in a last and final stand.

Needless to say, being greatly outnumbered, low on morale and discipline, and disorganized, they were ruthlessly crushed and defeated by the legions, with the vast majority of them being killed on the battlefield.

However, the last, decisive battle took place on the bank of the Sele River in southern Campania, and it claimed the life of Spartacus and sealed the defeat and end of the slave rebellion. The 6,000 rebels who survived were captured and crucified along the famous Appian Way from Rome to Capua.

In this way, the Third Servile War, which was the only slave rebellion that truly and directly threatened the Roman Republic, came to a bloody end.

Now, one might wonder what was the real motivation and goal of the rebellion. What did Spartacus and his rebel army hope to achieve? Was it freedom? Was it an attempt to reform Roman society and end slavery? Was it to march to the city of Rome and capture it and rule it?

Maybe it was none of the above. The only true and accurate answer to these questions, based on the information we have managed to acquire over the centuries, is that no one knows for sure. The real goal of the rebellion might never be known.

It is difficult, almost impossible, to believe that all the rebels had the same goal in mind. Most likely, they all had different ones which were personal to them. Maybe they did not fight for any greater purpose at all but for individualistic causes only. Maybe some desired freedom. Maybe some wanted revenge. Maybe some wanted to march to Rome and capture it. And maybe some wished to raid and plunder away for the rest of their lives.

Who knows? We may never know. History will not let us know the truth. A large part of Spartacus’ life and of the Third Servile War shall always remain a mystery, shrouded with uncertainty and with more speculation than facts for us to digest.

And maybe that is why the legend of Spartacus still lives on and even continues to grow. Maybe that is why he is regarded as a heroic figure in history and his life has managed to inspire great figures such as Toussaint Louverture, the great leader of the slave revolt that led to the independence of Haiti, who was often called the Black Spartacus. Karl Marx considered Spartacus one of his heroes, describing him as the most splendid man in the whole of ancient history and a great general, noble character, and real representative of the ancient proletariat.

As I mentioned at the start of this article, Spartacus was an absolute legend.

Books on Amazon

Listen to the audio version of this essay.

Every child across the world grew up learning about the great Christopher Columbus, the renowned Italian explorer who discovered the Americas in the year 1492. But few know that the term America is derived from a relatively unknown Italian explorer and navigator named Amerigo Vespucci.

Vespucci’s fame and reputation pale when compared to that of Columbus. His legacy, in terms of being a pioneering explorer, is nothing when compared to the giant influence of Columbus. However, for the sake of this essay, we must try not to compare Vespucci with Columbus, for Vespucci’s contributions are somewhat different yet significant enough for his name to be remembered for eternity.

So who was Amerigo Vespucci and why is his name taken along with that of Columbus and why is this essay about him? you might wonder. Well, allow me to help you with these doubts.

Amerigo Vespucci was an Italian merchant, explorer, and navigator, born on 9th March 1451 in the Republic of Florence, the center of the Renaissance at the time. He was the third son of Nastagio Vespucci, a notary for the Money-Changers Guild in Florence, and Lisa di Giovanni Mini.

Although not too wealthy or prosperous, the Vespucci family was politically well-connected and enjoyed close relations with the powerful Lorenzo de’ Medici, who was the de facto ruler of Florence. These influential connections afforded the Vespucci family certain privileges that they would not have otherwise been able to enjoy.

As Vespucci grew older, he was unsure of which career or occupation to pursue. His two older brothers, Antonio and Girolamo, had enrolled at the University of Pisa for their education. Antonio decided to become a notary like his father, and Girolamo entered the church to join the Knights Hospitaller (also known as the Order of Knights of the Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem) on the island of Rhodes.

But Vespucci remained uncertain and instead of following his brothers to the University he stayed in Florence and studied under the tutelage of his uncle, Giorgio Antonio Vespucci, who was a Dominican Friar in the monastery of San Marco and one of the most celebrated humanist scholars of the time.

His uncle educated him in philosophy, literature, Latin, rhetoric, astronomy, and geography. Vespucci’s later writings also revealed his familiarity with the work of classic Greek cosmographers such as Strabo and Ptolemy and the Florentine astronomer and cosmographer Paolo dal Pozzo Toscanelli.

Such a wide range of education would go on to play a significant role in his life and career.

In 1478, Vespucci, aged 27, was invited by an older cousin of his named Guido Antonio Vespucci on a Florentine diplomatic mission to Paris in order to obtain French support for Florence’s war against Naples. Vespucci accepted the invite and traveled to Paris along with his cousin as a private secretary or an attache, stopping at Bologna, Milan, and Lyon for other business. However, the diplomatic mission turned out to be a failure as Louis XI remained noncommittal.

On returning to Florence, Vespucci began working with his father while continuing his studies. Shortly thereafter in 1482, when Vespucci was 31 years old, his father died. He then began working for banker and politician Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco de’ Medici (also known as Popolano), who belonged to the junior branch of the House of Medici.

Vespucci and Popolano had been schoolmates under the tutelage of Vespucci’s uncle. Vespucci began working as a household manager first, slowly taking up more responsibilities and eventually handling various business dealings for the family at home and abroad.

During this period, Vespucci also purchased a map made by Spanish cartographer Gabriel de Vallseca and continued to study geography.

In 1488, Amerigo Vespucci was sent by Popolano to Seville in order to find a replacement for Popolano’s business agent there. Vespucci chose Florentine merchant Gianotto Berardi as the replacement, and Berardi soon began handling Popolano’s business in Seville.

In a couple of years, Vespucci had permanently settled down in Seville for reasons still unknown. And although he continued to handle some business affairs of the Medici family, he became more involved with Berardi’s activities, namely his support of the voyages of Columbus.

Berardi had invested half a million maravedis in Columbus’ first voyage in 1492. Subsequently, he won a contract to provision Columbus’ second fleet, and in 1495 he signed a contract with the Spanish crown to send twelve resupply ships to Hispaniola. Unfortunately, in December of the same year, Berardi died unexpectedly, leaving the terms of his contract unfulfilled.

Being the executor of Berardi’s will, Vespucci collected debts and paid off all outstanding obligations of the firm. At the end of it, the firm found itself in debt of 140,000 maravedis. Although Vespucci continued to provision ships bound for the West Indies, Columbus’ expeditions were not generating and bringing in the profits he had hoped for. And to make matters worse, Popolano had begun using the services of other Florentine agents for his business in Seville.

It was in the year 1497 that Amerigo Vespucci allegedly undertook his first-ever voyage to the New World, departing from Spain in May 1497 and returning in October 1498. Sadly, no one can say for certain if this alleged voyage actually took place or not, as the only indication and evidence of such a voyage taking place is a letter, supposedly written by Vespucci to a Florentine official named Piero Soderini in 1504 and published in 1505. In the letter, Vespucci (or whoever actually wrote it) gives an account of the voyage.

As this letter (which may or may not have been written by Vespucci) is the only document historians have managed to acquire regarding this first voyage, many scholars doubt such a voyage, as described in the letter, actually took place. The accuracy and authorship of the letter have been questioned and suspected by scholars over the centuries, many dismissing it as a forged letter. Scholars have also pointed out a few inconsistencies in the account, which only leads to more suspicion and speculation.

Some scholars such as Alberto Magnaghi put forward the theory that the letter was never written by Vespucci but by some unknown author who had access to Vespucci’s private letters to Lorenzo de’ Medici about his subsequent voyages in 1499 and 1501.

Other scholars such as the famous Spanish friar Bartolomé de las Casas speculated that Vespucci used his observations from his later voyages to write up a fictional account of this first voyage which probably never took place, just so that he could position himself over Columbus as the first European explorer to encounter the mainland of the newly-discovered continents.

The truth, unfortunately, is difficult to ascertain. Therefore, we must be content with mere speculation for now as we have no other choice.

This letter to Soderini is one of two letters attributed to Vespucci, both of which were widely circulated during his lifetime, thereby helping him gain more fame and reputation as an explorer and navigator.

Vespucci’s second voyage to the New World is said to have taken place in May 1499, when he was 48 years old. The mission of the expedition was to explore the coast of a new landmass found by Columbus on his third voyage and to investigate a rich source of pearls that Columbus had reported. The expedition, licensed by the Spanish crown, was led by Spanish explorer Alonso de Ojeda as the fleet’s commander and Juan de la Cosa as the chief navigator.

Although, when writing about the voyage later, Vespucci would give the impression that he had a leadership role in the expedition, which is highly unlikely due to his obvious inexperience. Vespucci and his investors did finance two of the four ships in the fleet, however, his actual role in the expedition is still not clear.

It is said that Ojeda later recalled that Vespucci had been one of his pilots on the expedition. However, some scholars speculate that he merely served as a representative of the fleet’s investors.

The fleet of four ships left Spain in May 1499 and on reaching present-day French Guiana or Surinam, the fleet split up with two ships going northward toward present-day Venezuela and two heading southward. Vespucci was in the fleet that went southward while Ojeda was in the one that went northward.

Vespucci and his crewmen assumed that they were skirting the coast of Asia and even believed that by heading south they would round the yet unknown and unidentified Cape of Cattigara (which modern scholars believe to be the archaeological site of Óc Eo in present-day Vietnam) and reach the Indian Ocean.

Again, the only account of this southward journey comes from Vespucci himself. He describes that they passed two huge rivers, identified as the Para and the Amazon. Further down south, they encountered a strong current that they could not overcome, and that forced them to return north to Venezuela by taking the same course back.

In the late summer of 1500, they headed to the Spanish colony of Hispaniola in the West Indies to repair and resupply their ships before heading back home. On the way back, they stopped at the Bahamas and captured 232 natives, and took them as slaves to Spain.

By the time Amerigo Vespucci returned from his second voyage, he had gained somewhat of a reputation as an explorer and navigator in Spain and Portugal. Impressed by his reputation, King Manuel I of Portugal hired him to serve as a pilot under the command of Portuguese explorer Goncalo Coelho for an expedition commissioned to investigate a landmass discovered unexpectedly by Portuguese nobleman and explorer Pedro Alvares Cabral on his voyage around Africa to India.

The Portuguese king wanted to know if this landmass lay to the east of the line established by the Treaty of Tordesillas so that it could be claimed by the Portuguese Empire. This landmass would become present-day Brazil.

The fleet of three ships led by Coelho left Lisbon in May 1501. When they stooped at Cape Verde to resupply the ship, they encountered Cabral, who was on his way home from his voyage to India during which he had discovered Brazil the previous year.

As per Vespucci’s account (which happens to be the only account of the expedition), upon reaching Brazil in August 1501, they were attacked by natives who killed and ate one of the crewmen.

Later, as they sailed further south along the coast, they encountered friendly natives with whom they engaged in some minor trading. On 1st January 1502, they came across a bay that they named Rio de Janeiro. The following month, they left the shores of Brazil to return home.

Vespucci would later claim that he understood that Brazil was part of a continent unknown and new to Europeans. Some historians such as Alexander von Humboldt questioned this claim, stating that both Vespucci and Columbus most likely died in the belief that they had reached the eastern edge of Asia.

As per the contentious and controversial letter written to Soderini, Amerigo Vespucci was part of a fourth expedition to the New World. This alleged voyage was again sponsored by the Portuguese crown with the intention to explore more of the east coast of Brazil.

However, the details of this voyage are unclear and even doubtful due to the contentious nature of the letter. It has not been determined yet who led the expedition (some speculate it was Coelho) or what was Vespucci’s role in it. Historians have also found inconsistencies with the dates and details reported in the account provided in the letter. This fourth voyage allegedly took place between 1503 and 1504.

By early 1505, Vespucci had returned to Seville with a surge in his reputation as an explorer and navigator. Since his return to Spain and the wide publication of the two letters attributed to him (written in 1503 and 1505), Vespucci’s fame grew across Europe.

The services he had rendered for the Portuguese crown increased his esteem and standing with the Spanish crown rather than diminishing it. King Ferdinand of Spain now wanted to navigate a western passage to India and summoned Vespucci to consult on navigation matters. Vespucci was paid by the crown for his services and in April 1505 he was declared a citizen of León and Castile by royal proclamation.

Vespucci would go on to serve the Spanish crown until his death in 1512, mainly supplying ships bound for the New World. In 1508, he was appointed chief pilot for the House of Commerce, which served as a central trading house for Spain’s overseas possessions. In this capacity, he was responsible for ensuring that the pilot of the ships was properly trained and licensed before setting sail to the New World. He also had to compile a model map based on the inputs from pilots who returned after each voyage.

By now, Vespucci’s fame as an explorer of the New World was at its peak, primarily because of the publication of the Waldseemüller Map (also known as Universalis Cosmographia), which was a world map made by German cartographer Martin Waldseemüller and published in April 1507.

The Waldseemüller Map was the first map to use the Latinized term America for South America, in honor of Amerigo Vespucci.

This world map prepared by Waldseemüller and humanist scholar and cosmographer Matthias Ringmann was titled Universal Geography According to the Tradition of Ptolemy and the Contributions of Amerigo Vespucci and Others, and it included portraits of Ptolemy and Vespucci. The introduction preceding the map (in which Vespucci is called a genius and in which naming the New World in his honor is justified) and the map itself became highly popular and a great success, with four editions being printed in the first year itself.

The map was used in universities across Europe and by cartographers who admired the craftsmanship that went into its creation. Subsequent maps were printed with the term America used for the New World, thereby increasing the popularity and wide usage of the term.

In the year 1538, cartographer Gerardus Mercator used the term America to name both the north and south continents on his world map.

Some historians claim that Vespucci was actually not aware of the Waldseemüller Map at the time of his death. However, this cannot be confirmed either.

Vespucci died on 22nd February 1512, leaving a modest estate to his Spanish wife and his books, clothes, and navigational equipment to his nephew Giovanni Vespucci. He was buried in his wife’s family tomb.

Since his death, Amerigo Vespucci has gone on to become a highly controversial figure, dividing opinions and sparking debates that would last for centuries to come. He is often regarded as the most enigmatic and controversial figure in early American history.

No historian or scholar could say for sure how many voyages Vespucci undertook, in what capacity, and what was the exact purpose of those voyages. Such uncertainty exists primarily because of the fact that Vespucci’s entire legacy rests upon just a few letters attributed to him but which cannot be confirmed.

Many scholars believe that he never wrote those letters on which his reputation rests, while some believe that the letters were fabricated based in part on genuine letters written by him.

Other significant writers and scholars such as Bartolomé de las Casas and Ralph Waldo Emerson have not only expressed doubts about his voyages but have even gone as far as to call him a liar and a thief, who stole the credit due to Columbus and managed to get the New World baptized with his dishonest name.

Others such as Sebastian Cabot and Humboldt have questioned his accomplishments and the truth of the letters attributed to him.

However, much like every subject of history, the subject of Vespucci is also riddled with contradictions and contrary opinions. Historians such as Francisco Adolfo de Varnhagen, Henry Harrisse, and John Fiske supported Vespucci’s claims and validated his voyages and accomplishments by claiming that the letters and their details were all true.

Till today historians argue about the truth and falsity of each of those four voyages, with most agreeing that the first one was highly unlikely and even impossible. Regarding the others, historians have taken various positions over the years, some espousing just one, some two, some three, and some all four.

The truth may never be known to us in its entirely accurate form, and so we have no choice but to be content with what we have, which is mostly speculation.

All these controversies surrounding Vespucci’s legacy did not prevent statues and monuments from being erected in his honor in various countries such as Italy, Colombia, and the US.

Whether his accomplishments were true or not, one cannot ignore the fact that Amerigo Vespucci is now widely regarded as one of the most prominent and significant explorers and navigators of the Age of Discovery. Regardless of whether he deserves it or not, his name and legacy have been cemented for the ages.